As Illustrated by Polish Criminal Law
The Mediation Settlement as a Directive of the Level of Sanction
← 72 | 73 → Dominika Bek
When Polish legislators codified criminal law anew in 1997, they built mediation into criminal process and accounted for the impact of its results on the type of conclusion reached in the proceedings. The aim of this chapter is an analysis of the significance of this incorporation, both for the imposition of penalties of different level or other penal measures and for a realisation of the idea of restorative justice. First it must be emphasised that, at present, Polish criminal law provides only for optional influence of the agreement between the offender and the wronged party on the outcome of criminal proceedings. However, as of 1 July 2015, the situation will change because of the amendment of art. 59a CrimC,1 to be discussed further in the text.
Positive effects of mediation carried out between the wronged party and the offender or the settlement reached between the two during the stage of proceedings before the court or prosecutor as general directive on the level of sanction.
The starting point for investigations on the present subject must be art. 53(3) of the Criminal Code of 6 June 1997 (Dziennik Ustaw of 1997, No. 88, item 553), according to which “the court, while meting out punishment, shall take into account positive effects of mediation between the wronged party and the offender or the settlement reached between the two in the proceeding before the court or prosecutor.” This provision is particularly clear for...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.