III. On Not Writing for Children
III.On Not Writing for Children
In order to fully comprehend the meaning of Travers’s Mary Poppins books, it is essential to examine the term children’s literature, as Travers’s work is generally thought to fall into this category. We will see, however, that the term proves to be uncomfortable.
M.O. Grenby offers us an insightful account of the origins of what has come to be called children’s literature in the Cambridge Companion to Children’s Literature. Notably, children’s literature as we know it today evolved in the middle of the 18th Century in Britain with rhymes, stories, riddles and alphabets on moral conduct. It is commonly thought to originate with John Newberry and his A Little Pretty Pocket-Book in 1744, with Newberry founding a children’s books publishing dynasty that lasted until well into the 19th Century (cf. Grenby 4). However, it is important to note that instructional books marketed at children had already then existed for centuries, and one must bear in mind the fact that children have always read texts that were not exclusively designed for them–from chivalric romances, novels, and ballads to fairy tales (cf. chapter 5), an assumption which can be supported by extensive evidence from diaries, marginalia and memories (ibid 5).
Hence, the question of what exactly constitutes children’s literature must be raised. Numerous suggestions have been put forward, such as children’s literature comprising books written exclusively for children, books that are read only by children, books...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.