The Role of the Vienna School in Shaping Central European Approaches to Art History and Related Discourses
VI. From Universalism to Nationalism: Transformations of the Vienna School’s Ideas in Central Europe
I. Art History as a State Science
First, let us enumerate the well-known facts concerning the Vienna School of Art History: on December 31, 1850, the Central Commission on the Research and Preservation of Historical Monuments (“K. k. Central-Commission für die Erforschung und Erhaltung der Baudenkmale”, since 1873 “Zentralkomission für Erforschung und Erhaltung der Kunst-und historischen Denkmale”) was established. In 1852, Rudolf von Eitelberger was appointed Extraordinary, and a little later, Ordinary Professor of Art History. On October 20, 1854, the establishment of the Institute for Austrian Historical Studies (“Institut für österreichische Geschichtsforschung”) followed. The history of art was part of the curriculum there. This was later turned into a chair and a department of art history. In 1864, a proposal by Rudolf von Eitelberger materialised as the Austrian Museum for Art and Industry (“Österreichisches Museum für Kunst und Industrie”).
It is also a fact that the institutionalisation of art history in the Habsburg Monarchy came into existence just after the defeat of the 1848 bourgeois Revolution – a fact that had very serious consequences for the nature of art history in Austria. Austrian art historical institutions did not arise as the realisation of the Enlightenment ideals. On the contrary, they were deliberately established as vehicles for political restoration. Generally speaking, their task was, on the one hand, to legitimise the restored political power of aristocracy by means of history, and on the other to contribute to the centralization of the...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.