Show Less
Restricted access

Scientific Visualisation

Epistemic Weight and Surpluses

Marianne Richter

Much of the recent confidence in the future of science and technology stems from advances in scientific visualisation. But is it right to assume that visual – and especially pictorial – measures carry special epistemic weight in the context of scientific reasoning? Do pictorial approaches have any surpluses, compared to other semiotic types? This book delves into these issues from the point of view of the philosophy of science. New examples from the field of scientific visualisation are introduced in order to account for the epistemic weight and surpluses of syntactically dense – pictorial – symbol systems.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Table of Figures

← 10 | 11 →Table of Figures


Fig. 1: Microscopy-like images (cf. Falk et al. 2009, p. 173)d

Fig. 2: Confocal laser scanning micrograph (cf. Falk et al. 2009, p. 169)

Fig. 3: Motivator [I]: Revision of the purely linguistic view of representation

Fig. 4: Pictogram by O. Neurath (1933ff.) showing Vienna’s net expenditure (cf. Neurath 1991, p. 322)

Fig. 5: Motivator [II]: Focal shifts in the philosophy of science

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.