Cosmic Order, the Movement of the Earth, and the Scientific Revolution
Part Two. Argumentation in Favor of The Earth’s Motion
← 112 | 113 → PART TWO
ARGUMENTATION IN FAVOR OF THE EARTH’S MOTION← 113 | 114 →
← 114 | 115 → Despite the general consensus that the earth is motionless in the middle of the universe and that terrestial motion is inconceivable,1 the matter is far from settled for Copernicus. He will call into question the concept of the stationary earth despite its support from theology, the sensus communis and almost the entire philosophy of nature until his time. His argument will transpose the inconceivable, absurd and ridiculous concept into a conceivable and scholarly legitimate theory. He believes firmly that the “acute and learned mathematicians” to whom the book is primarily dedicated – mathemata mathematicis scribuntur – will agree with him, “if, as this discipline especially requires, they are willing to examine and consider, not superficially but thoroughly,” what he adduces in De revolutionibus. Let us, then, take a look at what Copernicus offers “in demonstration of these matters.” How can he demonstrate the opposite of what is obvious? In what way does he, as he puts it, dispel “the fog of absurdity” of the thesis of the earth’s motion?
Anna De Pace has recently proposed a very original and appealing thesis regarding Copernicus’ method in the Book I of De revolutionibus. According to her,
Book I of De revolutionibus acquires its sense of unity through a particular method that dictates the development of the argumentation. The chapters do ← 115 | 116 → not follow […] the procedure of a doctrinal exposition,...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.