Loading...

The Ambivalent Character of Participation

New Tendencies in Worker Participation in Europe

by Francesco Garibaldo (Volume editor) Volker Telljohann (Volume editor)
©2010 Edited Collection 718 Pages

Summary

Participation is a social process, which is basically part of an exchange relationship. Thus, it is principally pluralist and ambiguous in its meaning. As a consequence, the reconciliation of voices needs innovative approaches to support balanced participation experiences. The ambivalent character of participation intends to provide a look at new initiatives in the various fields of workplace participation. Leading international scholars examine the role of institutional contexts for participation, the development of new forms of interest organisation as well as the relationship between organisational performance, participation practices and quality of working life. The contributions are not limited to taking stock of new experiences in the field of workplace participation, but also contribute to designing a new research agenda.

Details

Pages
718
Year
2010
ISBN (Hardcover)
9783631589434
Language
English
Keywords
employee representation industrial democracy wprkplace innovation EU labour legislation
Published
Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Wien, 2010. 718 pp., num. fig. and tables

Biographical notes

Francesco Garibaldo (Volume editor) Volker Telljohann (Volume editor)

Francesco Garibaldo is an industrial sociologist and former director of the Institute for Labour in Bologna (Italy). He worked for several years for trade unions and is vice-president of the Research Committee on Participation, Organizational Democracy and Self-Management RC10 of the International Sociological Association. Volker Telljohann is senior researcher at the Institute for Economic and Social Research of Emilia-Romagna (IRES ER). He is an industrial sociologist and secretary general of the international network Regional and Local Development of Work and Labour (RLDWL).

Previous

Title: The Ambivalent Character of Participation