The work challenges the commonly accepted idea that the European single market needs a harmonized company law as a precondition for its correct functioning, on the basis of a law and economics comparison with the American situation. The study critically analyzes the two major reasons advanced to justify harmonization – the race to the bottom argument and the standardization argument – on the basis of the regulatory competition paradigm and concludes that they are basically wrong. Instead of pursuing harmonization of substantive company law, the proposal is to adjust conflict of law rules in favor of the incorporation theory as ruled by the European Court of Justice in its important
Centros-decision of March 1999. Companies should be granted freedom of establishment and free movement among jurisdictions in the European Union.
Frankfurt/M., Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Wien, 2002. 235 pp.
Contents: EC company law: the state of the art – The theory of regulation and regulatory competition – The American
market for corporate charters – The European market for corporate charters – Policy conclusions.