Loading...

Nominal versus Clausal Complexity in Spoken and Written English

Theory and Description

by Uta Schäpers (Author)
©2009 Thesis X, 169 Pages
Series: English Corpus Linguistics, Volume 8

Summary

Halliday has claimed that neither spoken nor written language is more complex than the other per se, but that the two mediums show different degrees of complexity on different levels. He argues that written language uses more lexical items within the clause whereas spoken language uses more clauses within the clause complex. Thus, written language should use more complex noun phrases and spoken language should use more complex clause complexes. The aim of the study was to conduct a corpus-based study to analyse spoken and written language samples with regard to differences in complexity on the level of noun phrases and clause complexes. With the help of this study it was possible to refute Halliday’s thesis as the data show that both noun phrases and clause complexes are more complex in the language samples under scrutiny.

Details

Pages
X, 169
Year
2009
ISBN (Softcover)
9783631585689
Language
English
Keywords
Written English Spoken English Noun phrase Cause complex
Published
Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Wien, 2009. X, 169 pp., num. tables and graphs

Biographical notes

Uta Schäpers (Author)

The Author: Uta Katharina Elisabeth Schäpers studied German and English at the University of Bonn from 1997 to 2008, but she became especially interested in English Corpus Linguistics. She has published an article on conditional sentences in learner grammars and linguistic reality.

Previous

Title: Nominal versus Clausal Complexity in Spoken and Written English