Theoretical and Descriptive Models- Theoretische und deskriptive Modelle
Edited By Giancarmine Bongo and Giuditta Caliendo
In der heutigen Wissensgesellschaft sind die Mechanismen des Transfers von Fachwissen an Laien von großer Relevanz. Dennoch bleibt Popularisierung ein linguistisch noch relativ unbestimmtes und unerforschtes Phänomen. Ziel des Bandes ist deshalb, neue Perspektiven zu eröffnen und auf mögliche neue konsistente Modelle (sowohl theoretische als auch methodologische) hinzuweisen. Unterschiedliche Ansätze kommen dabei ins Spiel, u.a. Diskursanalyse, Rhetorik, Pragmatik, Korpuslinguistik und genre analysis.
Popularization and dissemination of legal knowledge in EU Summaries of Directives on immigration and asylumo: Vanda Polese, Stefania D’Avanzo
VANDA POLESE / STEFANIA D’AVANZO
“As a social science, law has its own specialised lexical and discourse conventions that have evolved with the history of that science” (Bedford 2005: 146). One of the crucial points of legal discourse is the presence of conventions and fixed rules, which may gradually change with the passing of time. However, some salient changes are undoubtedly due to the coming of new technologies and the aim to reach a wider audience.
The aim of this study is to investigate features of Summaries of EU legislation as forms of popularization. More particularly, our attention will be devoted to the semiotics of legal discourse reported on line, as this represents a source of legal information for everyone.
As a matter of fact, “The ‘Summaries of EU legislation’ website presents the main aspects of EU legislation in a concise, easy-to-read and unbiased manner. It forms part of the EUROPA portal, which is published by the EU institutions”1. Thus, a fundamental point in this study is to investigate to what extent online legal discourse becomes subject to features from other discourses when it goes through a channel for popularizing information. ← 191 | 192 →
Popularization is a controversial field which, like modality, appears to be rather slippery and fuzzy. It is therefore still in need of much further investigation as to the definition of its proper boundaries, its own linguistic markers, the ‘operationalization’ of control and power relations and the embedding of...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.