Franco Basaglia and Biopolitics
Examining both his practice and his theory of psychiatry, this book argues that Franco Basaglia foresaw this change in the paradigm of power, and that it is possible to trace its embryonic conception in his writings. Combining history of ideas, social and cultural history, and philosophical analysis, the book contextualises Basaglia’s works within the intense current debate on biopolitics. In doing so, it shows not only how his theory of the subject and his criticism of psychiatry are still as powerful and relevant now as they were in the 1970s, but also how Basaglia’s philosophy makes an integral contribution to the burgeoning field of contemporary Italian theory.
Chapter 2 The Subject and the Body
Introduction Having contextualised Basaglia’s work in Chapter 1, in this chapter I focus especially on those of his writings that show a clear inf luence of phenomenological psychiatry and existentialism, with the aim of pre- senting Basaglia’s notion of subjectivity. From Basaglia’s writings it can be understood that he envisions the subject, the individual and ultimately the person as intrinsically, always-already situated in a world and in a con- stitutional and constitutive relationship with all other people, with ‘the other’.1 In brief, Basaglia establishes a logical and ontological primacy of intersubjectivity over subjectivity: there is no subject outside of a world. The privileged pole around which this constitutional relationship is established is the body, which makes one aware of ‘being oneself ’, and of the presence of the other, by projecting one into the world. Through the body one can 1 It is important to note that throughout the following sections I will use the terms ‘individual’ and ‘subject’ almost interchangeably, in accordance with Basaglia’s use. I will leave an analysis of the distinction between individuality and subjectivity in Basaglia’s often undistinguishable use of the terms to the final chapter of this book. Furthermore, Basaglia often resorts to terms such as sé (self ) and io (I and ego). It is critical to note that, for the time being, these two terms are used neither with a Foucauldian connotation nor with a psychoanalytical one (i.e. the self is not regarded as the product of self-disciplining techniques and the ego is not...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.