Loading...

Crisis Communication Case Studies on COVID-19

Multidimensional Perspectives and Applications

by Mildred Perreault (Volume editor) Sarah Smith-Frigerio (Volume editor)
©2024 Textbook XVI, 398 Pages

Summary

This edited volume employs a case study approach to examine communication surrounding the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. The text is accessible to upper-level undergraduates and graduate students, while also useful for scholars’ teaching and research. The chapters are written by a diverse group of scholars and experts in a wide-array of communication contexts—from public relations and advertising to health, organizational, and political communication, and beyond. The chapters focus on the many ways professionals and laypersons employed crisis communication. This text is valuable in that it includes perspectives on crisis communication in the initial onset, crisis mitigation and long-term recovery stages of the crisis communication cycle. Examining a crisis in the mitigation and long-term recovery stages provides a lens into the process of crisis messaging and sensemaking. These case studies provide context not only for how professionals and laypersons handled COVID-19, but also how to approach other long-term, or prolonged, crises in the future.

Table Of Contents

  • Cover
  • Title
  • Copyright
  • About the author
  • About the book
  • This eBook can be cited
  • Contents
  • List of Figures
  • List of Tables
  • Acknowledgments
  • Chapter 1. COVID-19 Communication Case Studies, Where It Began and Why These Studies Matter
  • Chapter 2. When a Pandemic and an “Infodemic” Collide, Uncertainty Prevails: Misinformation & the COVID-19 Crisis
  • Chapter 3. #AloneTogether: A Qualitative Content Analysis of a Hashtag Campaign Providing Support through the COVID-19 Mental Health Crisis
  • Chapter 4. “Like Putting Out Fires, While Running on a Treadmill That Was Also on Fire”: Working and Parenting in a Pandemic
  • Chapter 5. Social Media Mourning: Dealing with Grief and Crisis Response Surrounding COVID-19
  • Chapter 6. COVID-19 and Higher Education: Navigating Ambiguity, Constraints, and Misplaced Optimism
  • Chapter 7. Branding, Marketing, PR, and COVID-19
  • Chapter 8. Advertising as a Form of Public Health Education: An Analysis of the Ad Council and COVID Collaborative’s “It’s Up to You” Vaccination Awareness Campaign
  • Chapter 9. Seventeen Weeks: Fan Reactions to the NFL’s COVID-19 Protocols during the 2020 Season
  • Chapter 10. Coronavirus and Journalism: A Meta-analysis of Early Research on Journalism in the COVID-19 Pandemic
  • Chapter 11. Six Feet Apart: A Case Study of Urban and Rural Medical Professionals’ and Health Systems’ Responses to COVID-19
  • Chapter 12. Is There a Difference? Generational Response to COVID and Media Usage
  • Chapter 13. Speaking Directly to Indigenous Communities via Social Media: Native Female Politicians Manage Community Information by Addressing Crises within a Pandemic
  • Chapter 14. Coping with a Pandemic Using Social Media: Nurses’ Expressions of Individual and Community Resilience on TikTok
  • Chapter 15. Political Rhetoric and Crises Communication During a Global Pandemic
  • Chapter 16. “It spread like Wildfire” and “Flooded Hospitals” Compounding Crisis: Climate, Wildfires, and Hurricanes during the Pandemic
  • Chapter 17. Communicating About COVID-19 and Black Lives Matter: A Case Study of Memes, Twitter & Reddit
  • Chapter 18. Calling COVID-19 the “Chinese Virus”: What Types of #ChineseVirus Messages Get Attention on Facebook Pages?
  • Chapter 19. Crisis Communication during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Perspective from the Online Communication of Public Health Agencies in Italy, Sweden, and the United States
  • Chapter 20. In the End, COVID-19 Goes On and On
  • Editors
  • Contributors
  • Index

Acknowledgments

We wish to express our sincere gratitude to those who supported us throughout the development of this edited volume. At the forefront of this list must be our amazing contributors, who have willingly shared their work and their feedback with us, and with fellow contributors. Thank you for being an integral part of this process.

We also wish to thank the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, from the members who selected our proposed volume during the 2021 Scholarsourcing competition, to the AEJMC editors who reviewed chapters and provided such wonderful feedback. Specifically, we wish to thank both Dr. Carolyn Bronstein and Dr. Katie Place, personally, for all of their help. This volume would not exist without the support of AEJMC.

We cannot forget to thank Peter Lang Publishing, and especially our editor, Elizabeth Howard, for answering any and all of our publishing questions and being a wonderful coach. You have made the development of this volume an enjoyable experience.

There are several professional groups that contributed to this project as well. We specifically wish to thank the members of the Crisis Communication Educators Facebook group, where so many ideas, including the seeds of this edited volume, began. We also wish to thank the wonderful group of scholars and professionals with the Disaster and Community Crisis Center at the University of Missouri, and in particular the Center’s Director, Dr. J. Brian Houston. The training and expertise we developed during our respective times with the DCCC has been invaluable.

Finally, we must be sure to thank our gracious spouses, children, family members, and friends. You have been cheerleaders, sounding boards, kept us fed and well-caffeinated, and so much more. Thank you for supporting us in all of our endeavors.

·1· COVID-19 Communication Case Studies, Where It Began and Why These Studies Matter

Sarah Smith-Frigerio & Mildred Perreault

Traditionally, crisis communication has found its home in public relations research. This book takes a different approach, building on the premise that crisis communication involves all facets of media and communication. College coursework in crisis communication often focuses on the objectives, strategies, and tactics needed to address a crisis happening at the community, organizational, or individual level. However, the COVID-19 pandemic makes it clear that crisis communication was needed—and happening—at all levels, simultaneously.

Scholars maintain that crises present both challenges and opportunities for multiple publics. In a situation like a pandemic, systems that are already stressed often are pushed beyond a breaking point. Systems and institutions are stressed, individuals experience disaster fatigue, and communities suffer. On the other hand, there is room for either developing or improving community resilience, as well as post-traumatic growth.

That said, scholars have often limited the scope of their studies to a specific level of interaction—individual, community, organizational, or societal—rather than examining the places where these responses intersect and overlap (Houston, 2021). Scholars in media and communication have identified the need to explore a variety of theoretical approaches in order to gain a more comprehensive view of crisis and disaster communication and consider the challenges and inequalities experienced by diverse populations, and the need for social change (Buzzanell & Houston, 2018; Matthews & Thorsen, 2022; Tierney, 2007).

We, like many scholars, experienced the pandemic as an opportunity to rethink the ways our areas of expertise intersect. Even in media and communication scholarship, there is a predisposition to exist in silos—carved out as journalism, public relations, advertising, science, health, or political communication, etc.—as if these fields do not have significant theoretical overlap. The pandemic affirmed how the relationships among these areas build a complex web, or ecology, where the actions of one group directly influence the decisions of another. For example, political pressure impacted the messages created by health departments, which, in turn, affected the way people understood the intensity of the pandemic and threat of the virus, which then changed the actions many took in their daily lives.

Although the pandemic was an unwelcome experience, for the authors contributing to this volume, research on the pandemic was not only a natural progression of their research agendas, but also an opportunity to shine new light on their respective areas of expertise. The pandemic forced us to understand crisis not only as a sudden disruption of daily life and operations, with clearly delineated pre-event, event, and post-event phases, but also as something capable of being a prolonged event that comes in waves, and with the propensity to fundamentally alter individual expectations and organizational goals. It changed the way we interact and engage, work and rest. For many, it communicatively transformed our being and sense of purpose.

These studies use different perspectives and methodologies, as well as situational analyses and foci. Crisis communication case studies on COVID-19: Multidimensional perspectives and applications is not only about a virus and its impact on various means of communication. Rather, it represents the ways in which fractures and cracks within our society were also brought to the forefront of our communicative practices. As mentioned above, crisis communication models have relied on a cyclical approach—a phase of preparation, experience of the crisis, recovery and resilience, and planning for the next crisis. That said, the pandemic illustrates that crises can certainly encompass all phases at the same time, with multiple, compounding crises occurring in tandem and competing for resources.

Why Case Studies?

The case studies, or chapters, presented in this volume are snapshots of COVID-19 experiences and topics organized into sections focused on individual, organizational, community and regional, and national and international contexts. Akin to Buzzanell and Houston’s (2018) call to advance research into resilience from “different metatheoretical perspectives and communication contexts” (p. 1), we believe the best means to investigate the communicative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic is to approach it from multiple theoretical perspectives and levels. Case studies are an inclusive and comprehensive way to examine crisis and disaster communication ecologies. Communication ecology approaches seek to understand the complexities and interactions that exist in our lives. People seek out information and interact with information in a variety of ways, but within the constraints of various structures and known options available to them.

Crises do not exist in a vacuum, and we are no sooner past one crisis than another issue or event brings on challenges. For individuals, these events test their character, for organizations they shape their viability and reputation. For example, the use of social media and interpersonal communication is one way to connect to others when you cannot share space, but as social media has become ubiquitous in both professional and personal lives, scholars have recognized the potential shortcomings and challenges of digital communication channels. Many chapters explore the ways in which campaigns situated in the social media realm can lack the tools to address misinformation, political polarization, and provide social support—but can also ensure ways to connect, find critical information and advocate for others. Given this perspective, we ask how social media can empower responses, engage diverse communities, or possibly even dilute crisis response, and crisis communication practices? Social media can be a powerful avenue for activism and engagement and reaches groups traditional media often cannot.

In our research, we have found many scholars evaluate crises at a particular level, and focus on the roles of individuals and audiences, institutions and systems, or communities when discussing topics such as marketing, health campaigns, advertising and engagement. These studies often fail to understand how grassroots efforts contribute to individual and community outcomes. In reality, each community consists of communication practices and processes at multiple levels, with many taking place within the greater ecological environment of a crisis simultaneously. In this volume, we can see how social media, for instance, plays several roles during COVID-19, at multiple levels, and we hope readers will be able to see the intersections of constructs relevant to social media use when reviewing the included cases at various levels within the communication ecology.

Individual

Individuals in crisis often use the knowledge they have gained from previous experiences to inform their responses. Those with prior experiences with natural disasters will, hopefully, be prepared for future ones, and also share their knowledge with those they encounter. Contributors in this section use the perspectives of individuals in the pandemic to inform their scholarship into seeking information, sharing messages, trying to survive without support systems, and coping with hardship, loss, and even death.

  • Chapter 2—When a Pandemic and an “Infodemic” Collide, Uncertainty Prevails: Misinformation & the COVID-19 Crisis

In this chapter, Anderson discusses the challenges created as information is distributed. A major finding of this case study is that people who regularly use social media were more likely to believe misinformation around COVID-19 health effects and claims. The author uses Uncertainty Management Theory and the Theory of Motivated Information Management to examine how social media users understood misinformation channels and sources.

  • Chapter 3—#AloneTogether: A Qualitative Content Analysis of a Hashtag Campaign Providing Support through the COVID-19 Mental Health Crisis

Freeman and Elton discuss the challenges of social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic and how people used the #AloneTogether campaign to connect and cope during isolation. Considering how social media has become an increasingly popular channel for disseminating mental health campaigns, given its global reach and cost-effectiveness, this campaign is a great example of the intersection of crisis communication and mental health campaign practices.

  • Chapter 4—“Like Putting Out Fires, While Running on a Treadmill That Was Also on Fire”: Working and Parenting in a Pandemic

In Chapter 4, Johnsen and Elkhalid discuss the challenges of parents who lost all support systems and were suddenly required to teach, entertain, and protect their children with very limited resources and support structures. By using the ideologies expressed in the work-to-home spillover research, the authors provide a case study of the cognitive blurring of boundaries between work and home responsibilities.

  • Chapter 5—Social Media Mourning: Dealing with Grief and Crisis Response Surrounding COVID-19

In this chapter, Moore discusses the challenges of death and grief and how the pandemic heightened those challenges, but also how it created a collective experience beyond family, community, and national boundaries. This case uses the Theory of Social Mourning as a lens to examine the collective experiences of those who lost loved ones during the pandemic.

Organizational

The Crisis Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) framework (Reynolds & Lufty, 2018; Reynolds & Seeger, 2005) has focused on how organizations, specifically the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, should respond to crises and disasters. While the primary purpose of crisis communication and applying this framework is to help organizations overcome crises and disasters, some studies focus exclusively on organizational response, thereby prioritizing—unintentionally— organizational response as the most important response. The cases presented in this section consider this level of response, as well as its shortcomings, constraints, and overlaps with other levels. In this way, the organizational section of this volume mirrors recent research, for example, in healthcare and crisis management which considers how emergency personnel often use dialogue to mediate the actions of others in critical situations—like a pandemic.

Additionally, this section provides a variety of frameworks for understanding the ways in which brand management and audience engagement can differ even when organizations are experiencing the same global crisis.

  • Chapter 6—COVID-19 and Higher Education: Navigating Ambiguity, Constraints, and Misplaced Optimism

Valiavska’s study examines the specific challenges of those working in higher education during the pandemic. The author examines the demonstrable negative impact on the lives and livelihood of members of historically marginalized communities as a result of the pandemic and how that was augmented on college campuses. The author acknowledged how different narratives emerged in different phases of the pandemic. The chapter also provides an approach to more inclusive practices in future health crises.

  • Chapter 7—Brand, Marketing, PR, and COVID-19

In Chapter 7, Schneider examines the ways that specific brands and organizations approached the pandemic. Using the lens of sponsorship, as well as congruence theory, the author presents a case study of digital approaches to marketing, public relations, brand management and other related fields during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

  • Chapter 8—Advertising as a Form of Public Health Education: An Analysis of the Ad Council and COVID Collaborative’s “It’s Up to You” Vaccination Awareness Campaign

Applequist and Abrahamsen examined the “It’s Up to You” COVID-19 Vaccine Campaign, which featured an integrated marketing communications approach, employing multiple platforms and materials. The chapter uses the Critical Advertising Studies Paradigm to examine how different types of advertising are a more appropriate fit for crisis and health campaigns.

  • Chapter 9—Seventeen Weeks: Fan Reactions to the NFL’s COVID-19 Protocols during the 2020 Season

Harrison and colleagues look at the response to COVID-19 by the NFL during the Fall 2020 season in Chapter 9. The authors examine the communications approaches of the NFL by using both Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) and Image Repair Theory.

Community and Regional

Many crises will impact specific groups, communities, or regions, and all individuals within those communities simultaneously. For instance, crises and disasters can influence the interpersonal relationships of all individuals within a community. That said, there can also be many differences in the experiences of individuals within communities, and public officials must be prepared to communicate effectively with various constituencies without frightening their constituents. This can mean different levels of engagement and varied approaches to these groups. Community leaders must educate without provoking harm whenever acts of terrorism, mass violence, natural or other disasters, and public health emergencies occur.

Additionally, community resilience and crisis planning models can focus on the roles, experiences, and identities held by specific groups. For example, during the pandemic, much emphasis was placed on the roles and experiences of first responders, medical professionals, and journalists. Similarly, the studies within this section examined the roles and experiences of underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, Indigenous communities and others. In the modern era, communities can span beyond geographic borders, and messages are often tailored toward groups with different media preferences, trust, and levels of engagement.

  • Chapter 10—Coronavirus and Journalism: A Meta-analysis of Early Research on Journalism in the COVID-19 Pandemic

In this chapter, Perreault and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis of journalism studies research of the COVID-19 published during the early stages of the pandemic in top-tier communication journals. The authors use Bourdieu’s Field Theory to understand how journalists thought about their work and how research framed the work of journalists in the pandemic. The study also draws attention to the habits of journalists and how they can inform their actions in future crises.

  • Chapter 11—More than Six Feet Apart: A Case Study of Urban and Rural Medical Professionals’ Responses to COVID-19

Chapter 11 looks at rural health practices and communication efforts of different hospitals based on their location. Richards and Bunn use the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication Model (CERC) and a Grounded Theory approach to examine how the practices and challenges of these hospitals were communicated on social media.

  • Chapter 12—Is There a Difference? Generational Response to COVID and Media Usage

Reif-Stice and colleagues examine the divides between different generational groups during the pandemic and how they experienced the pandemic differently but also similarly through their media use. Using Uncertainty Management Theory, the authors identify some specific fragmentations and intersections in the media channels generational groups tapped into when seeking information about the COVID-19 pandemic.

Details

Pages
XVI, 398
Year
2024
ISBN (PDF)
9781433192234
ISBN (ePUB)
9781433192241
ISBN (MOBI)
9781433192258
ISBN (Softcover)
9781433192227
DOI
10.3726/b18897
Language
English
Keywords
Advertising Crisis Communication COVID-19 Health Communication Journalism Media Ecology Organizational Communication Political Communication Public Relations Social Media Crisis Communication Case Studies on COVID-19 Multidimensional Perspectives and Applications Mimi Perreault Sarah Smith-Frigerio
Published
New York, Berlin, Bruxelles, Chennai, Lausanne, Oxford, 2024. XVI, 398 pp., 20 b/w ill., 7 tables.

Biographical notes

Mildred Perreault (Volume editor) Sarah Smith-Frigerio (Volume editor)

Mildred F. "Mimi" Perreault (Ph.D., University of Missouri) is an Assistant Professor in the Zimmerman School of Advertising and Mass Communication at the University of South Florida. Perreault has researched public relations, local journalism, and disaster communication. Previously, Perreault was an Assistant Professor of Media and Communication at East Tennessee State University. Sarah Smith-Frigerio (Ph.D., University of Missouri) is an Assistant Professor of Public Relations in the Department of Communication at The University of Tampa. She focuses on health and crisis communication, particularly how individuals use digital media for peer support and health advocacy when facing health concerns.

Previous

Title: Crisis Communication Case Studies on COVID-19