Karl Popper and the Reconstruction of Progressive Politics
Preface An unapologetic focus on Karl Popper’s contribution to progressive political thought is the principal feature distinguishing this book from others that examine Popper’s philosophy. Many other works consider Popper’s epistemology or ethics; a large number of commentaries are devoted to his philosophy of science, especially to his social scientific methodological prescriptions; some value Popper as an educational theorist. Among scholars who evaluate Popper’s political theory, several find a moderate-conservative orientation implicit in his writings, at least in his essays subsequent to the publication of The Open Society and Its Enemies. Meanwhile, critics on the Left have treated Popper as a dangerous opponent or responded only to a straw man of their own creation. Malachi Hacohen’s work is a remarkable exception to the general field; he places Popper’s early contribution within the traditions and discourse of the Left. However, Hacohen writes as an intellectual historian, not a political theorist. I examine Popper’s attempt to develop a political theory that draws upon Socratic fallibilism and commitment to ethical autonomy while preserving progressive sociological insight and commitment to activism. My primary concern is to show how Popper sought to utilize a ‘Socratic’ critique of Marxism to improve the political theory of the Left. I regard Popper’s contribution to be of enormous value and consider his capacity for theoretical innovation as elevating him to the first rank among philosophers. In his prime, Popper unambiguously identified with the “humanitarian camp” of liberals and the democratic Left. For Popper, progress is achieved not in a...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.