An International Study of News People in the Digital Age
Edited By Susanne Fengler, Tobias Eberwein, Gianpietro Mazzoleni and Colin Porlezza
These questions were tackled in an international survey of 1,800 journalists in twelve European and two Arab states conducted by the EU-funded research project, «Media Accountability and Transparency in Europe» (MediaAcT). The results provide a solid empirical basis for the discussions taking place. This book advances research on media accountability and transparency, and also offers innovative perspectives for newsrooms, media policy-makers, and journalism educators. Its systematic comparative design makes it an unprecedented venture in international journalism studies.
6. Little Impact? Journalists’ Perceptions of Traditional Instruments of Media Self-Regulation: Salvador Alsius, Ruth RodrÃguez-MartÃnez & Marcel Mauri de los Rios
Little Impact? Journalists’ Perceptions of Traditional Instruments of Media Self-Regulation
Salvador Alsius, Ruth Rodríguez-Martínez & Marcel Mauri de los Rios
This chapter focuses on journalists’ views of traditional ‘self-regulatory’ instruments that pre-date the Internet—first, ethical codes, some of which are general, while others are implemented internally within media companies, and second, press councils and ombudsmen, both designed precisely to ensure compliance with the essential principles of the codes (Gore 2008, 33). We also take into account other long-established instruments which, although less explicitly, contribute to media accountability, such as trade journals and media criticism in the news media, while the impact of innovative online MAIs will be discussed in the next chapter.
Not many previous empirical studies exist on journalists’ attitudes towards media accountability and self-regulation. However, it is well known that journalists from many countries have different attitudes (and not always solid ones) about the concept of self-regulation and its instruments. In some countries, the idea that seemed to prevail among professionals was that it is undesirable to excessively regulate any information activity (Haraszti 2008; Puddephatt 2011). The sentence “the best press law is that which doesn’t exist” was frequently stated. Consequently, many journalists supported self-regulation. However, this perception seems to have shifted in recent years, with many journalists beginning to call for more (co-)regulation after finding that the concept has not always been as effective as originally intended (Alsius 2012). For this reason we...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.