Show Less

Event and Result Nominals

A Morpho-semantic Approach

Chiara Melloni

The syntax and semantics of deverbal action nominals, notoriously ambiguous between event and result interpretation, have been a thought-provoking issue in many areas of theoretical linguistics. This volume contributes to current work on this topic by showing how the analysis of these nouns can benefit from a morphological and lexical-semantic treatment.
While being a revealing synthesis of a number of formal accounts on this popular research domain, this study specifically targets the largely unexplored area of result nouns and addresses several crucial issues. What are result nouns in a strictly lexical-semantic perspective? Why do some verb classes allow ambiguous event/result nominal correlates, while others do not? What are the relevant verbal features involved in result noun formation? Is there a range of predictability in the number and types of meaning conveyed by a derived nominal?
Couched within a framework of decompositional lexical semantic, the analysis offers original formal solutions to the polysemy issues arising in this word formation domain and convincingly argues in favor of the semantic alignment between the morphologically simplex and complex lexicon. A compelling range of Italian data provides empirical support to the author’s claims.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

References 303


References ALEXIADOU, A. 2001. Functional Structure in Nominals. Amsterdam: Benjamins. ALEXIADOU, A. and M. RATHERT (eds), 2010. The Semantics of No- minalizations across languages and frameworks. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ALEXIADOU, A., L. HAEGEMAN, and M. STAVROU (eds) 2007. Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ANDERSON, S.R. 1984. “Prenominal genitives NPs”. The Linguistic Review 3: 1-24. ANDERSON, S.R. 1992. A-Morphous Morphology. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. APRESJAN, J. 1974. “Regular Polysemy”. Linguistics 12: 5-32. ARONOFF, M. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cam- bridge, Mass.: MIT Press. ARONOFF, M. 1984. “Word formation and lexical semantics”. Qua- derni di Semantica 5 (1): 45-49. ASHER, N. 1993. Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ASHER, N. and A. LASCARIDES, 2001. “Indirect speech acts”. Synthe- se 128 (1-2): 183-228. Dordrecht: Springer. BACH, E. 1986. “The algebra of events”. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 5-16. BAKER, M. 1988. Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. BARKER, C. 1998. “Episodic -ee in English: A thematic role constraint on new word formation”. Language 74: 695-727. BARTSCH, R. 1981. “Semantics and syntax of nominalizations”. In Formal Methods in the Study of Language, J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stockhof (eds), 1-28. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre Tracts 135. 304 BARTSCH, R. 1986. “On aspectual properties of Dutch and German nominalizations”. In Temporal Structure in Sentence and Dis- course, V. Lo Cascio and Co Vet (eds), 7-39. Dordrecht: Foris. BAUER, L. 1983. English Word Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BEARD, R. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme Based Morphology. New York:...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.