Studies in Honour of Giuseppina Cortese
Edited By Sandra Campagna, Elana Ochse, Virginia Pulcini and Martin Solly
The sections in the volume are designed as main threads of a new investigation into ‘languaging’. The first, entitled Languaging Awareness, deals with recent findings in applied linguistics, exploring key topics in language acquisition, language learning and teaching and the changing role of the media. The second section, Languaging Identity, prioritizes the theme of the construction of identity in text and talk within a linguistic and languaging framework. The third section, Languaging Community, explores the notion of community, of the lifeworld and the textworld emanating from a variety of domains, closely inspecting contemporary events and showing, on a continuum with Cortese’s approach, how memory of the past gives depth of meaning to a discourse analysis that is geared to linguistic and textual awareness.
Sign Language: The State of the Art in Italian Universities Fourteen Years On
Historically worldwide, standard spoken/written national languages based on a common set of rules developed in most countries and were assimilated and spread through education and more recently the mass media. This did not hold true for sign languages (SL). SL was banned in educational institutions from 1880 throughout Europe1 until the mid-twentieth century. It developed in closed, almost clandestine, pockets retaining significant cultural and linguistic differences which still abound in most European Deaf communities today (Kellett Bidoli 2001: 135). The result has been the development of numerous signed languages or dialects. In Italy, CNR2 researchers based in Rome began analysing the language of the Roman Deaf community in the early eighties and gathered signs recognisable in other parts of the country to form a corpus known as LIS (Lingua dei Segni Italiana – Italian Sign Language; see Volterra 1981, 1987). LIS is the signed version now most frequently seen on Italian television, used in dictionaries of Italian Sign Language (e.g. Angelini et al. 1991; Radutsky 1992) and adopted at national conferences by SL interpreters. It has belatedly developed into an accepted standard form that helps to solve miscomprehension among deaf individuals who live in communities throughout the peninsula where numerous dissimilar signed varieties have come into existence. ← 475 | 476 →
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.