Show Less
Restricted access

Philosophical Perspectives on the Self

Series:

Edited By Joao Fonseca and Jorge Goncalves

For the last decade the topic of the Self has been under intense scrutiny from researchers of various areas spanning from philosophy, neurosciences, and psychology to anthropology and sociology. The present volume addresses the Self under different and influent philosophical perspectives: from phenomenology and psychoanalysis to metaphysics and neurophilosophy and discusses several and distinct problems such as personal identity, the core/narrative self-distinction, psychopathologies, the mind-body problem and the nature of the relations between self, consciousness and emotions. The book reflects these different philosophical problems and approaches and aims to provide a map of current philosophical perspectives on the topic of the Self.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

The Division of the Mind: Paradoxes and Puzzles

Extract



VASCO CORREIA

1. Beyond divisionism

The hypothesis that the mind is divided is often put forward as a means to make sense of irrationality, whether in the cognitive sphere (delusional beliefs) or in the practical sphere (weak-willed actions). In essence, the “divisionist” argument states that we cannot understand irrational actions and beliefs without assuming that the mind is composed of different sub-systems. Donald Davidson (1985b, p. 353), one of the most prominent proponents of divisionism, explicitly endorses this methodological assumption:

I have urged in several papers that it is only by postulating a kind of compartmentalization of the mind that we can understand, and begin to explain, irrationality.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.