Affect and Transformative Ideas
“There are two moments worthwhile in writing, the one where you start and the other when you throw it in the waste-paper basket”. So proposes Samuel Beckett. His insight begs the question, however, as to how anything would get written if we were to routinely throw away what had just been penned. Moreover, it raises a question as to how ideas might develop at all if, in their emergent states of confusion, their movement was not stabilised by their inscription upon a durable surface of some kind.
It was not from Beckett that I learned to consign my daily writing to the rubbish bin. Rather, the lesson had come to me from Picasso; or, at least, from the scraps of an urban myth which I heard about the way in which Picasso painted. According to the myth, Picasso would produce his master-pieces in a very short time; perhaps just a few hours. Behind that act of rapid production, however, lay several months of sketching various elements of the emergent piece. At some point in time, so the myth continued, that process of continual sketching would incite a sense that the compositional challenges of the painting could be grasped and that the time to paint was about to impress itself. Upon hearing the story, I began to wonder if Picasso’s practice might transfer to the world of written words; and to the discursive composition of ideas more particularly. And so began a new practice: early morning sun;...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.