In the Southern Caucasus and the Black Sea Region
Edited By Ghia Nodia and Christoph H. Stefes
War Economies and Protracted Conflicts: The Cases of Abkhazia and South Ossetia
ABSTRACT: This chapter looks at the role of war economies in the protraction of conflict in Abkhazia and South Ossetia from the early 1990s to 2008. It mobilizes the existing literature on boundary activation, borderlands, sanctions and the transformation of war economies to map the complexity of the two cases, while relying on extensive fieldwork to elucidate the economies of the Abkhaz and South Ossetian protracted conflicts. As a result, it unveils some of the incentives in increasing or decreasing levels of violence and protracting or ending conflict.
KEYWORDS: political economies, conflict protraction, boundary activation, Georgia, Abkhazia, South Ossetia
This chapter focuses on the dynamics underpinning the protraction of the Abkhaz and South Ossetian conflicts between the ceasefire agreements of the early 1990s and the resumption of a full-scale conflict in 2008. The fact that both cases are protracted conflicts that cannot be considered to be resolved due to lack of a peace agreement, but that little full-intensity confrontation has occurred, is an important element of this analytical framework. These are not the only cases of no-peace, no-war protracted conflicts – ranging from neighbouring Nagorno-Karabakh to the 50-year long case of Korea – but contain enough variations within their development to allow us to observe the dynamics of separatist protracted conflicts from a new angle.
The question that I ask here – “What role did the war economies play in the protraction of the Abkhaz and South Ossetian conflicts after the establishment of ceasefire agreements...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.