The Role of Exodus 4:24-26 in the Book of Exodus
Chapter VI – Neglected Circumcision 93
Chapter VI Neglected Circumcision The broad approaches, Source Criticism, Form Criticism, Traditio- Historical Criticism, and Social Scientific Criticism, inevitably encoun- ter the possibility that the motivation for the assailant seeking to kill Moses or the person pursued in the story in Exod 4:24-26 is the neglect of circumcision. This contingency also appears in other approaches dis- cussed later in this work, but this explanation is so prominent in the pre- sent group of methods that it seems natural to discuss this at this junc- ture. Scholars do not agree as to the identity of the individual who had not been circumcised as the cause for the attack described in Exod 4:24-26. This study attempts to delineate and discuss each proposal. 31. Moses Was Uncircumcised One early rabbinic explanation of Yahweh’s or an angel’s attack on Moses is that Moses had not been circumcised. Exod. Rab. v. 8 says Zipporah knew Moses was in trouble because he had not been circum- cised, because the angel swallowed Moses from his head to the place of circumcision. Immediately Zipporah circumcised Moses, and the angel departed.1 Similarly, R. Judah b. Bizna taught that Af and Hemah, angels of wrath and anger, swallowed Moses, one from his head and the other from his feet to his legs (genitals), and immediately Zipporah circum- cised her son and they withdrew (Exodus Rabbah-Shemot 1.32-33, 4.1-4, 5.3-8).2 L. Ginzberg relates the rabbinic story in this way: 1 See Vermes, ‘Circumcision and Exodus IV 24-26,’ 185-90....
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.