Bishop John Stokesley and the Divorce, Royal Supremacy and Doctrinal Reform
Chapter 1: The Divorce: Theology 23
Chapter I The Divorce: Theology There have been many attempts made to try to understand the significance of Henry VIII's first marriage crisis.! For the most part these have taken a very negative view of the King, his motivations and his scholarly support. Although he often seemed sincere and scrupulous, as did his agents, both he and they have often been found wanting by the many calculating and even callous episodes in which they were involved. Stokesley himself, as one of the King's primary supporters, if not as both he and Chapuys believed, the 'principal cause and instrument', of the divorce has suffered much ill-treatment at the hands of historians. Moreover, this treatment has often been indirect, as Stokesley's role in these events has never truly been appreciated.2 That he was involved on a very intimate level is beyond question. Why he was involved, however, is more problematic. It might simply have been a matter of course. A series of miscarriages had dented the King's optimism for his marriage and, by 1518 his frustration was beginning to show. He wrote to Wolsey about it3 and held a consultation with his confessor, Stokesley. Details are provided by the Spaniard Loys de Helweghen. In a letter he recalled a recent dinner conversation with William Barlow, dean of Westbury, who reportedly said that ... the king, after he had been married nine or ten years, having gone to confess to a priest whom the Dean named, though being a strange name I have quite...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.