Diametric and Concentric Spaces in the Unconscious World
The book, which also examines projected structures in modernist art, suggests a systematic refashioning of many Western assumptions, but it is more than a deconstruction. It also attempts to offer a new interplay between structures and meaning, as a spatial phenomenology. This significant expansion of the boundaries of human subjectivity opens alternative pathways for imagining what it means to be human, in order to challenge the reduction of experience to instrumental reason.
Part III Spatial-Phenomenology as a Discourse Prior to Language and Myth
through a Collective Spatial Unconscious chapter 7 Transcending Subjectivity and Myth in Search of Meaning The work of Jung and Derrida is conjoined by a preoccupation with loss of meaning. Both respond to the crisis of meaning by interrogating a broaden- ing of understanding beyond individual subjectivity. Less obviously, both extract key insights concerning the need to transcend myth in search for meaning. Their inquiries centrally engage with spatial themes. A spatial-phenomenological reinterpretation of their work on the unconscious world requires straddling domains of structuralism and post- structuralism, modernism and postmodernism. It is not being sought to systematically explicate the divergent, multifarious strands within these far from monolithic abstractions, nor to bring fully to the fore tensions between conceptions of modernism and modernist movements in art and literature. A necessarily selective and somewhat fragmented exploration of these terrains is being adopted in relation to concentric and diametric spaces, and Jung and Derrida’s work in particular. In doing so, it is sought to build on the strengths of aspects of these movements, while avoiding at least some of their pitfalls. While modernist writers like Eliot and Beckett were rejecting and challenging the comforts of the edifices of myth to sustain and organize reality,1 they emphasized the rootlessness, disintegration and wasteland 1 As Eagleton (1995) highlights, Joyce’s modernist employment of myth varied between its use as a formalist device and as an ironical inversion. Joyce arguably gave expres- sion to both Freudian and Jungian concerns in his novel Ulysses. In similar...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.