Studies in English Language History in Honour of Leiv Egil Breivik
Edited By Kari Haugland, Kevin McCafferty and Kristian A. Rusten
The essays are all empirical studies, based on a wide range of corpora (both historical and contemporary) and applying theoretical approaches informed by Systemic-Functional Grammar, grammaticalization theory, dependency grammar, historical linguistics, sociolinguistics and corpus linguistic methods. Issues of methodology, statistics and corpus construction and annotation are also addressed in several contributions.
Sarah Hoem Iversen: Do you understand this, my little pupil?: Children’s dictionaries, pedagogy and constructions of childhood in the nineteenth century
← 330 | 331 → SARAH HOEM IVERSEN
Do you understand this, my little pupil?: Children’s dictionaries, pedagogy and constructions of childhood in the nineteenth century
1 Children’s dictionaries and the history of lexicography
Although there has been extensive previous research both on children’s literature and on lexicography in the nineteenth century, children’s dictionaries in this period remain an unexplored field. The lacuna is unsurprising: children’s dictionaries are generally regarded as twentieth-century phenomena, pioneered by American educationalist Edward Thorndike with the publication of his Thorndike century junior dictionary (1935). Histories of lexicography generally acknowledge that the original purpose of English dictionary-making was pedagogical in the sense that early dictionaries were primarily compiled for school pupils (Osselton: 1983: 13–14, Schäfer 1989: 2, Starnes & Noyes 1991: 1, Landau 2001: 25, Béjoint 2010: 62).
Landau argues, however, that dictionaries addressed to children before the mid-twentieth century were simply smaller-sized adult dictionaries which made ‘no concession to simplicity […] in the treatment of vocabulary’ (2001: 25). It is perhaps not surprising, then, that children’s dictionaries (of any period), though ‘interesting for the metalexicographer’, have ‘rarely been the object of research’ (Béjoint 2010: 48).
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.