Show Less
Restricted access

On the structure of A-bar constructions in Dagbani: Perspectives of «wh»-questions and fragment answers


Samuel Alhassan Issah

This book provides an account of the structure of A-bar constructions, focusing on wh-questions and fragment answers in Dagbani, a Mabia (Gur) language spoken in Northern Ghana. It demonstrates that Dagbani wh-phrases occur in two distinct positions, ex-situ and in-situ, except for subject wh-phrases, which only occur in the former position. It provides a theoretical analysis of the distribution of the wh-phrases couched within minimalism (Chomsky 1995). Finally, the book gives an account of the structural correlation between wh-questions and their answers with the focus on the syntactic derivation of fragment answers. The author contends that the derivation of fragment answer involves two processes: A-bar movement together with PF-deletion

Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Chapter six On the syntax of answers to wh-questions and the derivation of fragment answers


6.0 Introduction

The preceding chapter provided language internal evidence to support the movement analysis proposed for the formation of Dagbani wh-questions in this dissertation. Given the proposed analysis according to which the derivation of in-situ and ex-situ wh-questions involves covert and overt movement respectively to Spec, Foc, a legitimate expectation is that they should be constrained by island effects. I demonstrated that in Dagbani syntactic domains such as relative clauses, coordinate structures, and complex NPs disallow extraction of wh-phrases in line with Ross’s (1967) notion of syntactic islands. This sensitivity to islandhood constraints, I argued offers straightforward support for the analysis that there is a movement operation in the derivation of wh-questions.

This chapter focuses on the structure of answers to wh-questions and the syntactic derivation of fragment (elliptical) answers. The formal similarity between the structure of answers to wh-questions and syntactic derivation of context-sensitive (fragments) answers raises both descriptively and theoretically interesting questions that require a systematic investigation. It is shown that although wh-phrases can occur in both ex-situ and in-situ positions, this distribution does not have to be identical in questions and their corresponding answers. This is because it is not mandatory for an ex-situ wh-question to have an ex-situ focus as its answer. I further discuss the constraints on question/answer pairs showing that there are some well-formedness constraints imposed on congruent answers in Dagbani, a fact that is quite pervasive in languages of the world.

The chapter also delves...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.