Jews, Christians and Pagans in Antiquity
Edited By Jörg Ulrich, David Brakke and Anders-Christian Jacobsen
Apologetics and Orthodoxy 209
Apologetics and Orthodoxy Jörg Ulrich The subject I am going to deal with arose from considerations of the planning committee of this conference. It sprang from the idea that we ought to look back to the proceedings of our scholarly project an apologetics in the last years, and should look ahead as well to what will be our subject in the coming next years, namely norms, normativity, and orthodoxy. Apologetics and orthodoxy: what do these two phenomena have to do with each other, and how could they possibly be related? First of all, it is clear that both subjects are key issues in any reli- gion and in any theology. Both - apologetics and orthodoxy - belong to the traditional canon of subjects in ancient history as well in early church history. Most of the early Christian sources that have come down to us deal either with matters of apologetics or with matters of heresy and orthodoxy, regardless of whether viewed broadly or narrowly. Aspects of both apologetics and orthodoxy attract aca- demic attention, and have done so since the nineteenth century,1 ' For orthodoxy (and heresy) see A. Hilgenfeld, Die Ketzergeschichte des Urchristen- tums. Urkundlich dargestellt, Leipzig 1884; W. Bauer, Rechtgläubigkeit und Ketzerei im ältesten Christentum, Tübingen 1934. 21964 (=BHTh 10); R.A. Kraft, The Development of the Concept of "Orthodoxy" in Early Christianity, in: FS M.C. Tenney, Grand Ra- pids 1975, 47-59; N. Brox, Häresie, in: RAC 13 (1984), 248-297; for apologetics see G....
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.