Legal Rules in the Name of Democracy and Democracy in the Name of Legal Rules: Parallel Deaths of Socrates and Julius Caesar edited by Romina Amicolo University of Naples “Federico II”, Italy Abstract: The complete picture of the deaths of Socrates and Julius Caesar allows to represent, in an exhaustive and problematic way, a concept of democracy and legal rules, traditional, but by now inadequate to the increasing social complexity, that, with the sentence of Socrates and the murder of Julius Caesar, executes its extreme attempt of self-defense and self-maintenance. Key words: Democracy, legal rules, parallel convergences, justice, freedom, ethics, equality, politics, republic, tyranny 1. The death of Socrates: legal rules in the name of democracy Socrates “quite calmy and with no sign of distaste”1 “drained the cup in one breath,”2 while most of his comrades, who, up till that time, “had been fairly successful in keeping back”3 their tears, when they “saw he was drinking, that he had actually drunk it,”4 they “could do so no longer”5: and also Phaedo’s tears, in spite of ________________ 1 Plato, Phaedo, 117 C 5. 2 Ibidem, 117 C 6. 3 Ibidem, 117 C 7. 4 Ibidem, 117 C 8. 5 Ibidem, 117 C 9. 330 Romina Amicolo The death of Socrates, Jacques-Luis David, 1787 The murder of Caesar, Vincenzo Camuccini, 1798 himself, “came pouring out, so that he covered his face and wept brokenheartedly – not for him,”6 but for his “own calamity in losing ________________ 6 Ibidem, 117...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.