5. ‘Impersonal’ and Reflexive Constructions
5.1 ‘Impersonals’ and Reflexives: Medieval Features Verbs of motion and emotion are often used with a coreferential pronoun, which is likely to function as a reflexive pronoun. One of the reasons is that these verbs are mostly used intransitively and, in the process of the transitivisation, take a reflexive construction: e.g. he wende (intransitive) > he wende him/hine (reflex- ive)1 > he wende hine (transitive); ic ondræde (intransitive) > ic ondræde me (reflexive) > ic ondræde him (transitive). Moreover, some verbs of motion and emotion are used ‘impersonally’, i.e. with the dative of person and with or without hit: (hit) me fareð, (hit) him licað. Since the ‘personal’ construction, i.e. with the nominative of thing and the dative of person, is found in Old English, as well as the fewer instances of the personal construction, i.e. with the nominative of person, the time of the transition from ‘impersonal’ to personal constructions differs according to each verb. 5.2 Statistic Results It seems better to have a look at the general tendency of ‘impersonal’ and reflex- ive constructions in Old and early Middle English. Here I give Tables 10 and 11. Table 10a shows the frequency of syntactic environments of Old English ‘imper- sonal’ verbs2, Table 10b those of Cura Pastoralis (MS Hatton 20), Table 10c those of Ælfric’s Catholic Homilies. These tables are given to show the increas- ing tendency of the ‘impersonal’ verbs used with the nominative of thing, though the increase is rather slow. Table 10a: Syntactic Environments of...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.