Alternative Analysis to the Mainstream "Blackboard Economics</I> Based on the Concept of "Creative Mental Labor</I>
6-The Neoclassical Marxists
Introduction At the time of Marx, he and many other economists considered labor, in one form or other, given whatever natural resources that were used, to be the origin of all created value. Nothing could be produced without labor's contribution. Thus, every commodity produced could be seen simply as a function of the labor time spent on the natural resources that they used. As William Petty asserted: “Labor was regarded as the father of (material) wealth, while the earth its mother.” (in Marx,Vol. I,pp.133-134) With the rise of the Marginalist theory around the 1870s, the approach to the status of labor began to change radically. An ideological struggle against the Marxist's claims provided new premises in economics based on "objective scientific" methodology which led to attempts which claimed to put economics on the same analytical plane as Newtonian mechanics. These new analytical methods suggested that economics ought to be as scientific as astronomy in its precision and its ability to make accurate predictions. In- deed, these attempts succeeded in making economics a “pure” science which became known as "Neoclassical Economics". But, unfortunately, it paid the price of drifting away from the real world and the actual transactions that take place within it. As the Nobel Laureate Ronald Coase once stated, eco- nomics became “blackboard economics” (Coase; 1991,p.4). Newtonian mechanics has undergone significant changes since then, but its economic “imitators” remained loyal. Growth and microeconomic theories are still dominated by the neoclassical parable. As in all other parts...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.