2: Pragmatic approaches to SELF pronouns
Chapter 2 Pragmatic approaches to SELF pronouns 2.1 Introduction As was shown in Chapter 1, English SELF pronouns are to a large extent subject to the binding condition A. On the other hand, there are certain contexts in which SELF pronouns, although perfectly acceptable to native speakers, are applied in a way that does not conform to the requirements set for them by BT. At the same time, the Binding Theory, as devised and elaborated on by Chomsky, serves very well to describe the English anaphors and pronominals, yet some other languages, even those belonging to the Germanic language family, seem to have a different system of principles governing the distribution of various nominal expressions. This has led to certain modifications of the standard binding theory, among which is the proposal that, instead of one type of A-binding, anaphoric expressions can be classified as belonging to one of three distinct A-binding domains – short, medium and long-distance binding. Short-distance anaphora does not present any challenge to the Binding Theory; the remaining two types, however, often cannot be successfully dealt with without recourse to other descriptive tools. In the case of locally free SELF pronouns discursive factors might prove to be the main justification of their use. Therefore, the question arises to what extent discursive factors determine the use of SELF pronouns, with the related uncertainty concerning the status of all SELF elements as a homogenous category (most frequently referred to as reflexive pronouns). Since there are structures where SELF pronouns are...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.