Romanians and Power in the Mediaeval Kingdom of Hungary- The Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries
1. How could the mechanism of power in the Middle Ages be understood
Ever since the Renaissance, we have become accustomed to treating the Middle Ages both with contempt and much shallowness. As the period has grown more and more distant, these attitudes have steadily increased in time. Who has not heard phrases like “mediaeval barbarism”, “mediaeval darkness”, “behaving like in the Middle Ages”? Contempt is inherent in the name itself: the two adjacent terms mean the “middle period”, in the sense of an uninteresting, unimportant and even embarrassing aside, situated be- tween the luminous classical (Greco-Roman) Antiquity, which provided the model or the ideal of culture and civilisation, on the one hand, and the Re- naissance, which sought to revive this ancient model as accurately as possi- ble, on the other. On closer inspection, “revival” meant copying or imitation, and when imitation became obsolete and was abandoned, the gradual tran- sition to modern culture began. Since artists, scholars, the litterati from the fifth to the fourteenth centuries–that is, the mediaeval men of culture and creators–did not, with very rare exceptions, imitate the classical Greek and Latin works, they were treated with contempt and disdain, and were ig- nored, for a long time, together with their works. Of course, a Gothic church is nothing like a Greek temple, but not because the people of the Middle Ages did not know how to build Greek temples, as it was thought for a while. They were simply not interested in this. They had an altogether dif- ferent sensibility, and another conception of divinity...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.