Show Less

Prolegomena to the Study of Modern Philosophy



This book is divided into nine chapters trying to draw attention to the various aspects of the understanding of God, to the question of the individual, the ideal state arrangement, and the question of freedom (free will) as well as of history. Special attention is paid to the issue of cognition, the question of reason and sense, as well as language and the issue of a system in philosophy. The chapters are arranged to show the historical characteristics of the issues with an introduction of the key approach and ideas with references.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

The Question of God in Modern Period Philosophy


  Keywords: negative theology, theism, pantheism, panentheism, deism, fi deism, atheism, agnosticism, theological optimism.   Despite the fact that the characteristic features of the deviation of modern philosophical thinking from the Middle Ages means turning away from the central posi- tion of theology and the question of God in reasoning, the issue of God and His knowability has remained important in the modern era. Some philosophers (e.g. F. Bacon) reckoned that God should not be the subject of philosophy, and we should instead focus our refl ec- tions on nature. In spite of the diversity of attitudes, generally it can be said that in the modern period God becomes an object of thinking in a new concept – He is an object which can be examined through the examina- tion of nature, or possibly, our own nature. Analyses of God’s knowability and existence, ho - wever, undergo various forms in the modern period: from unknowability, to the complete subordination 14 of God to reason; from His inevitable existence, to his hypotheticality, or even denial. Nicolaus Cusanus thematises God through his refl ec- tions on mathematical infi nity. Cusanus realizes that the attributes commonly attributed to God, such as infi - nitely gracious, eternal, omniscient, omnipotent, are an application of the infi nity attribute to God (Cusa, 1990, 7 – 10). But what is the infi nite? Unlike ancient thinkers, who understood the infi nite as incompleteness Cusanus perceives it positively – as a  limited expression of any quality. However, the limit of the infi nite...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.