At the XIII International Colloquium of Comenius Studies in Uherský Brod, which dealt with Erasmus, Johannes Valentinus Andreae, and John Amos Come- nius, the Czech philosopher and historian Robert Kalivoda said that Comenius’s philosophy of man was largely uncharted territory. He could not have known that his observation would remain valid for two decades to come.1 Today, Czech and foreign scholars can draw on a large number of studies deal- ing with Comenius’s works. However, the majority of those barely scratch the surface of the philosopher’s conception of man, or else view it from only one perspective (most frequently, a pedagogical one). Surprisingly enough, several publications dealing with Comenius’s anthropology had been planned, but either were not completed or did not make it to the publishing stage. Take for example Kalivoda’s intended second volume of the Hussite Monograph, which was to deal with anthropological questions, or the unpublished monograph J. A. Komenský, myslitel o nápravě člověka [John Amos Comenius: A Thinker Concerned with the Reformation of Man].2 Gertrud Britschgi’s dissertation, which analyses a wide spectrum of sources, is probably the most important contribution to the study of 1 Kalivoda, Robert: Komenského pojem emendace a reformační myšlení [Comenius’s Conception of Emendation and Reformation Thought]. In: SCetH 35 (XVIII), 1988, p. 37. During the ensuing discussions, Kalivoda expanded on his paper: “What I have presented here is only a brief description of the problem. To resolve it, a lot of work, or maybe a whole book...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.