Show Less
Restricted access

The Maidan Uprising, Separatism and Foreign Intervention

Ukraine’s complex transition


Edited By Klaus Bachmann and Igor Lyubashenko

The current crisis in Ukraine has revealed a striking lack of background knowledge about Ukraine’s history and politics among West European politicians, journalists, intellectuals and even many academics. In this book, experts from Poland, Ukraine, the US, Russia and Western Europe fill the gap between an omnipresent and easily available narrative about Russia and a scarce, scattered knowledge about Ukraine. They show what history and political science can offer for a better understanding of the crisis and provide insights, which are based on reliable Ukrainian, Russian, Polish and Turkish sources and confidential interviews with key actors and advisors. Rather than offering easy answers, the authors present facts and knowledge, which enables the reader to make up his own informed opinion.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

From Maidan to Moscow: Washington’s response to the crisis in Ukraine


Toluca, Mexico, is an unusual setting for the President of the United States to make some revealing comments about Ukraine. But that was precisely the place Barack Obama chose on 19 February 2014 to deliver his first personal remarks in public on the crisis in that European country.2

The president had travelled to Mexico for a North American Leaders Summit, but as Kyiv found itself in the grip of the worst violence in years, Mr Obama had no alternative but to bring the deepening crisis to the forefront. Without being asked and shortly after his arrival to Toluca, the President condemned the violence in “the strongest terms”, said the US would hold the Ukrainian government responsible and warned that there would be consequences if people stepped “over the line”.3

Later that same day, his administration demonstrated its concern by announcing a visa ban on 20 unnamed senior Ukrainian officials who it considered to be responsible for the chaos.4 That decision would be an early sign of the sanctions that were to become the White House’s preferred tool for responding to the crisis.

The president also discussed Russia’s role in its neighbouring country. He acknowledged that Moscow and Washington had different views, and rejected the popular notion of his being on a “Cold War chessboard”.5 His comments were ← 321 | 322 → described at the time as “an unusually personal attack on the Russian President”,6 Vladimir Putin, but they would soon become...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.