Show Less
Restricted access

Approaches to Middle English

Variation, Contact and Change

Series:

Edited By Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre and Javier Calle-Martín

This volume contains a selection of papers presented at the 8 th International Conference of Middle English, held in Spain at the University of Murcia in 2013. The contributions embrace a variety of research topics and approaches, with a particular interest in multilingualism, multidialectalism and language contact in medieval England, together with other more linguistically-oriented approaches on the phonology, syntax, morphology, semantics and pragmatics of Middle English. The volume gives a specialized stance on various aspects of the Middle English language and reveals how the interdisciplinary confluence of different approaches can shed light on manifold evidences of variation, contact and change in the period.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

s-Pluralisation in early Middle English and word frequency: Ryuichi Hotta

Extract

Ryuichi HottaChuo University

s-Pluralisation in Early Middle English and word frequency1

1.Introduction

In the historical study of English, it is well-known how various nominal plural formations in Old English (hereafter OE) have been historically reduced to effectively the only one, -s. Histories of English (Strang 1970: 259–261, 296–298), Lass (1992: 109–112), and Baugh and Cable (2013: 95; 160), to name a few, mention this historical process only in passing as if the topic had already been discussed enough. They normally describe the growth of s-pluralisation as follows: in OE, the suffix -as, for the majority of strong masculines, was already a dominant nominative/accusative plural marker; in Late Old English and Early Middle English, the suffix grew in productivity, affecting, by analogy, many nouns that historically did not take -as; by Late Middle English, most nouns formed their plural forms with -es with its vowel variable, leaving intact only a small group of high-frequency lexemes, many of which have survived irregular to this day.

Indeed the description above of the general trend of s-pluralisation is well supported by historical evidence and cannot be doubted. It is not equally well understood, however, how individual nouns changed and varied in plural formation in the period when s-pluralisation was growing in productivity. As is the case with many language changes, the generalisation of the s-plural was a process that proceeded gradually over a fairly long span of time. In the long-standing process, individual...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.