Show Less
Restricted access

Diverse Narratives of Legal Objectivity

An Interdisciplinary Perspective

Series:

Edited By Vito Breda and Lidia Rodak

This volume presents a collection of essays on objectivity in legal discourse. Has law a distinctive type of objectivity? Is there one specific type of legal objectivity or many, depending on the observatory language utilized? Is objectivity fit for law? The analyses in the various contributions show that the Cartesian paradigm of objectivity is not relevant to the current legal discourse, and new forms of legal objectivity are revealed instead. Each essay, in its distinctive way, analyses the strong commitment of law to objectivity, shedding light on the controversies that surround it.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Bibliography

Extract



Agamben G., Homo Sacer [:] Sovereign Power and Bare Life, transl. Daniel Heller- Roazen, Stanford: Stanford University Press (1998).

State of exception, transl. Kevin Attell, University of Chicago Press (2005).

Anscombe, G. Modern Moral Philosophy, the Journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy (1958).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.