Studies in American History and Culture, 1820-1920
Chapter 2 Fighting Slavery: Various Shades of Abolitionism
| 33 →
Fighting Slavery: Various Shades of Abolitionism
The Missouri Compromise, the Kansas–Nebraska Act, the Lincoln–Douglas debates, and ultimately the Civil War reveal the immense significance of slavery in the social and political life of the Republic and, at the same time, the growing importance of various emancipation solutions. The fact that slavery was sanctioned by the Constitution (Article. I, Section. 2 and Article. IV, Section. 2), made fighting it a complicated task, especially with the country’s divergent social and economic interests represented by its different sections. According to Eric Nellis, this constitutional acceptance of slavery was possible since “[n] orthern states understood that slavery had to be accepted if a national union was to be made” (133). As a matter of fact, the government, until the immediate pre-Civil-War period, assisted the owners of slaves in dealing with their property, especially in cases of fugitive bondsmen: “The federal government acted as the extended arm of Southern slaveholders in . . . fugitive-slave disputes during the 1791 – 1861 period as U. S. attorneys, justices, commissioners, marshals, diplomats, soldiers, and Indian agents became increasingly active in recovering fugitive slaves and in ensuring compensation in cases where they were not recovered” (Ericson 80).
Since the idea of ownership was cherished and upheld by the Republic, the slaveholders’ commodity was no exception. The slave was property and as such could not own any property or engage in any civil contracts. His legal rights were limited to...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.