The Case of Polish Children in Sweden
Chapter 7 Some conclusions
The analysis of the errors in the use of case in the idiolects of the Polish diaspora in Sweden casts new light on a number of problems connected with the structure of this morphological category and on certain aspects of language acquisition. The most important conclusion that can be drawn from the analysis of the phenomena discussed in this chapter concerns the hierarchical structure of the category of case. A clear difference can be observed between the unmarked, neutral case: the nominative and the strong dependent cases: the accusative and the genitive, on the one hand, and the weak dependent cases: the instrumental and, particularly, the locative and the dative, on the other. The unique status of the nominative in the case system is manifested through several tendencies observed in the linguistic material:
a.In the idiolects with a seriously disrupted case system, the nominative form shows a clear tendency to function as the only realisation of the lexeme (i.e. it constitutes a neutral, caseless form);
b.The nominative is (virtually) never replaced with dependent cases, even in the idiolects with an incompletely acquired category of case;
c.The nominative form quite frequently occurs in place of different dependent cases.
The status of the nominative as an unmarked, most neutral element in the case system is obviously by no means unique to the diaspora idiolects. This fact is commonly attested in both philo- and ontogenetic data concerning the category of case. For example, it is...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.