Early Christian Apologists
Edited By Jakob Engberg, Anders-Christian Jacobsen and Jörg Ulrich
Nils Arne Pedersen
1. Introduction. Eusebius’ information
Aristides’ apology (ἀπολογία) is often considered to be the oldest preserved Christian apology, and despite its poor literary qualities, this factor justifies careful treatment. It is interesting to note whether analysis of Aristides highlights certain aspects of that type of texts which have been called early Christian apologies.
To say that Aristides’ apology has been preserved is only partially true. The text has only been incompletely preserved in its original Greek language, there are several textual variants, and unfortunately it is unclear what the original text should be in several of the work’s most important passages. It is therefore necessary to explain the complicated problems relating to the text’s transmission to the reader before launching into discussion of its content.
Aristides’ apology was formerly only known through the works of Eusebius of Caesarea (approx. 260–341 AD) and authors who used Eusebius as a source. In the second part of his Chronicle, (Eus., chron.) which may have been written in the late third century,1 Eusebius recounts that Emperor Hadrian (117–138 AD) was in Athens, where Quadratus and the Christian philosopher Aristides of Athens presented him with apologetic writings. After the Emperor had also received questions about the Christians from Serenius Granianus, he issued a rescript favourable to the Christians to Minucius Fundanus, proconsul of Asia2. This is supposed to have happened in the year 2141 after Abraham, which corresponds to 125 AD3,...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.