Loading...

Parental Custody After Separation or Divorce

A Comparison Between German and Chinese Law

by Shuang Wang (Author)
©2020 Thesis 254 Pages

Summary

Different from the traditional legislation in family issues which focused on marriage and divorce, current legislation in Germany has come to highlight the relationship between parents and children. The book focuses on parental custody after separation or divorce in Germany and China before a legal comparison is drawn. Furthermore, the book explores possible legal reforms in this field in the two legal systems.

Table Of Contents

  • Cover
  • Title
  • Copyright
  • About the editors
  • About the book
  • This eBook can be cited
  • Acknowledgements
  • List of Abbreviations
  • 1 Introduction
  • 1.1 Research Background
  • 1.2 Current Research Status
  • 1.3 Structure of the Thesis
  • 2 Historical Development of the Legal Concept ‘Parental Custody’
  • 2.1 Before the Implementation of the BGB
  • 2.1.1 Ancient Roman Law (753 B.C.-​A.D. 476)
  • 2.1.2 From the Early Modern Era to the End of 19th Century
  • 2.2 Milestone Reforms to the Laws on Parental Custody Since the BGB of 1900
  • 2.2.1 The BGB of 1900
  • 2.2.2 Law of the Equal Rights Between Men and Women
  • 2.2.3 First Reform Law on Marriage and Family of 14 June 1976
  • 2.2.4 Reform of Parental Custody Act of 18 July 1979
  • 2.2.5 Reform of Parents and Child Act of 1 July 1998
  • 2.2.5.1 Background of the Reform
  • 2.2.5.2 Main Content of the Reform
  • 2.2.6 Reform of Act of Parental Custody of the Unmarried Parents of 19 May 2013
  • 2.2.6.1 Background of the Reform
  • 2.2.6.2 Main Content of the Reform
  • 2.3 Current Applicable Laws
  • 2.3.1 Domestic Laws
  • 2.3.1.1 Basic Law (GG)
  • 2.3.1.2 BGB
  • 2.3.1.3 FamFG
  • 2.3.1.4 Book VIII of Code of Social Law
  • 2.3.2 International Laws and Conventions, Regulations of EU
  • 2.3.2.1 Convention on the Rights of the Child
  • 2.3.2.2 Child Protection Convention of Hague Conference
  • 2.3.2.3 European Convention on Human Rights
  • 2.3.2.4 Brussels IIa
  • 2.4 Summary
  • 3 An Overview of the Legal Concept of ‘Parental Custody’
  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.1.1 Concept of ‘Parental Custody’
  • 3.1.2 Legal Nature
  • 3.1.2.1 Right or Duty?
  • 3.1.2.2 Public or Private?
  • 3.1.2.3 Summary
  • 3.1.3 Types of Parental Custody
  • 3.1.3.1 Care for the Person and Care for the Property
  • 3.1.3.2 Joint and Sole Parental Custody
  • a) Joint Parental Custody
  • b) Sole Parental Custody
  • 3.1.4 Comparison with Other Legal Terms
  • 3.1.4.1 Parental Responsibility
  • 3.1.4.2 Guardianship, Legal Care and Curatorship
  • 3.2 Care for the Person
  • 3.2.1 Content
  • 3.2.2 Limitation to Parental Custody
  • 3.2.2.1 Objectives of Parenting
  • 3.2.2.2 Limitation to Rights of Parents
  • a) Avoidance of Violence Abuse
  • b) Consideration of the Growing Independence of the Child
  • aa) Abortion
  • bb) Religion
  • c) Supervision of State Authorities
  • 3.2.3 Duration, Suspension and Deprivation
  • 3.2.3.1 Duration
  • 3.2.3.2 Suspension
  • a) Legal Hindrance
  • aa) Incapacity of Contracting in § 1673 BGB
  • bb) Confidential Birth in § 1674a BGB
  • b) Actual Hindrance (de facto) in § 1674 BGB
  • c) Legal Consequences of Suspension
  • 3.2.3.3 Deprivation
  • 3.2.4 Limitation of Liability (§ 1664 BGB)
  • 3.3 Principle of the Best Interests of the Child
  • 3.3.1 Introduction
  • 3.3.2 Evolution of Evaluation Criteria
  • 3.3.2.1 Era of Gender Bias
  • 3.3.2.2 Priority of the Parent Without Fault
  • 3.3.2.3 Doctrine of Primary Caretaker and Tender Years Preference
  • 3.3.2.4 Principle of the Best Interests of the Child
  • 3.3.3 In German Law
  • 3.3.3.1 Introduction
  • 3.3.3.2 Application Scope of This Principle
  • 3.3.3.3 Criteria to Evaluate the Best Interests of the Child
  • a) Capability of Parents
  • b) Connection of the Child
  • c) Will of the Child
  • d) Principle of Continuity
  • e) An Example of Case-​Law
  • aa) Legal Facts
  • bb) Application of Criteria to Evaluate the Best Interests of the Child
  • 3.3.3.4 Conclusion
  • 4 Parental Custody for the Child Born in Wedlock
  • 4.1 Joinder of Divorce Proceedings and Ancillary Proceedings
  • 4.2 Determination of the Residence of the Child
  • 4.2.1 Residence Model (Residenzmodell)
  • 4.2.2 Nest Model (Nestmodell)
  • 4.2.3 Switching Model (Wechselmodell)
  • 4.2.3.1 Introduction
  • a) Definition
  • b) Precondition
  • 4.2.3.2 Legal Issues in Dispute
  • a) As a General Rule?
  • b) Against Will of Parents?
  • c) In Custody or Contact Proceedings?
  • d) Positive Application of the Best Interests of the Child
  • e) Current View of the BGH
  • 4.2.3.3 Problems in Practice
  • a) Physical Feasibility
  • b) Registration of Primary Residence
  • c) Payment of Child Support
  • 4.3 Exercise of Joint Parental Custody After Separation
  • 4.3.1 Introduction
  • 4.3.1.1 Scope of Application
  • 4.3.1.2 Distinction Between Matters of Everyday Life and of Significant Importance
  • 4.3.2 Decision in Matters of Everyday Life of the Child
  • 4.3.3 Decision Concerning Matters of Great Importance for the Child
  • 4.3.3.1 Matters of Great Importance
  • a) School Issues
  • b) Healthcare
  • aa) Vaccination
  • bb) Circumcision of Male Children
  • c) Religion
  • d) Trip Abroad
  • 4.3.3.2 Court Decision in Case of Dissent Between Parents
  • 4.4 Right of Contact
  • 4.4.1 Introduction
  • 4.4.1.1 Legal Basis (§ 1626 III and § 1684 BGB)
  • 4.4.1.2 Legal Nature
  • a) Right and Duty of Parents
  • b) Right of the Child
  • 4.4.1.3 Ways and Place to Exercise Right of Contact
  • 4.4.2 Between Parents
  • 4.4.2.1 Cooperative Behaviour Obligation in § 1684 II BGB
  • a) Cooperative Behaviour Obligation of the Resident Parent
  • b) Cooperative Behaviour Obligation of the Non-​resident Parent
  • c) Claim for Compensation
  • d) Expenditure out of Right of Contact
  • 4.4.2.2 Right to Demand Information on Personal Circumstances of the Child
  • 4.4.3 Court Orders by the Family Court
  • 4.4.3.1 Arrangement of the Contact by Court (§ 1684 III BGB)
  • a) Criteria
  • b) Appointment of a Contact Supervisor (§ 1684 III 3 BGB)
  • 4.4.3.2 Restriction and Exclusion of Right of Contact (§ 1684 IV BGB)
  • a) Principle of Proportionality
  • b) Accompanied Contact
  • aa) General Rules
  • bb) Presence of a Third Party
  • cc) Comparison with Contact Supervisor
  • 4.4.3.3 No Compulsion for the Child to Have Contact with Parents
  • 4.4.4 Administrative Means of Coercion and Enforcement in §§ 89, 90 FamFG
  • 4.4.4.1 Two Means of Coercion
  • 4.4.4.2 Principle of Proportionality
  • 4.4.4.3 Enforcement in § 90 FamFG
  • 4.4.5 Need for Further Reform
  • 4.4.5.1 Stricter Burden of Proof
  • 4.4.5.2 More Punitive Measures
  • 4.4.5.3 More Effective Legal Protection
  • 4.5 Transfer from Joint Parental Custody to Sole Parental Custody According to § 1671 I BGB After Separation
  • 4.5.1 Introduction
  • 4.5.2 § 1671 I 2 Nr. 1 BGB
  • 4.5.3 § 1671 I 2 Nr. 2 BGB
  • 4.5.3.1 Examination of Withdrawal of Joint Parental Custody
  • 4.5.3.2 Examination of Transfer of Sole Parental Custody
  • 5 Parental Custody for the Child Born Out of Wedlock
  • 5.1 Historical Development of the Legal Status of the ‘Illegitimate’ Child
  • 5.1.1 Before the Entry into Force of the BGB
  • 5.1.2 From 1 January 1900 to 23 May 1949
  • 5.1.3 Since the Entry into Force of the Basic Law
  • 5.1.3.1 Revision of Family Law of 11 August 1961
  • 5.1.3.2 Act on Children Born Out of Wedlock of 19 August 1969
  • 5.1.3.3 Reform of Parental Custody Act of 18 July 1979
  • 5.1.3.4 Reform of Parents and Child Act of 1 July 1998
  • 5.1.3.5 Reform of Act of Parental Custody of the Unmarried Parents of 19 May 2013
  • 5.1.3.6 Act to Strengthen Rights of the Biological but not the Legal Father
  • 5.1.4 Conclusion
  • 5.2 Types of Parental Custody of Children Born Out of Wedlock
  • 5.2.1 Sole Parental Custody of the Mother in § 1626a III BGB
  • 5.2.2 Sole Parental Custody of the Father Through Court Decision According to § 1671 II BGB
  • 5.2.3 Joint Parental Custody Through Declaration in § 1626a I 1 BGB
  • 5.2.3.1 Formality
  • 5.2.3.2 Time of the Declaration
  • 5.2.3.3 Legal Nature
  • 5.2.4 Joint Parental Custody Through Marriage in § 1626a I 2 BGB
  • 5.2.5 Joint Parental Custody Acquired by Court Order in § 1626a I 3, II BGB
  • 5.2.5.1 Legal Requirements
  • 5.2.5.2 Criteria to Decide on Transfer of Joint Parental Custody
  • a) Negative Assessment Criterion
  • b) Positive Assessment Criterion
  • c) Study on Decisions of Local Courts
  • d) Decision of BGH on 15 June 2016
  • 5.2.5.3 Proceedings for Transfer of Joint Parental Custody (§ 155a FamFG)
  • 5.2.6 Another Type?
  • 5.3 Rights of the Biological but Not the Legal Father
  • 5.3.1 Introduction
  • 5.3.2 Right to Acknowledge Paternity and Apply for Determination of Paternity
  • 5.3.3 Right to Challenge Paternity
  • 5.3.3.1 Historical Development
  • 5.3.3.2 Reform Need in German Law
  • a) Impulse from Decisions of the ECtHR
  • b) Advice on Legal Reform
  • 5.3.3.3 Two Fathers?
  • 5.3.4 Right of Contact and to Claim Information
  • 5.3.4.1 Introduction
  • 5.3.4.2 Application Precondition
  • a) Serious Interest
  • b) In the Best Interests of the Child
  • aa) Examination Criteria
  • bb) Different Criteria Between § 1686a I 1 BGB and § 1686a I 2 BGB
  • 5.3.4.3 Procedure According to § 167a I FamFG
  • 5.3.4.4 Summary
  • 5.4 Right of the Child to Know Genetical Paternity
  • 5.5 Conclusion
  • 6 Involvement of State Authorities
  • 6.1 Justification of Involvement of State Authorities
  • 6.1.1 Autonomy of Parents and Supervision and Assistance of State Authorities
  • 6.1.2 Fundamental Rights of the Child
  • 6.1.3 Roles of State Authorities
  • 6.2 Family Court
  • 6.2.1 Introduction
  • 6.2.2 Involvement of the Court from the Perspective of Substantive Law
  • 6.2.2.1 Court Decision in §§ 1628 and 1631 BGB
  • 6.2.2.2 Court Measures upon Endangerment of the Best Interests of the Child in § 1666 BGB
  • a) Precondition of Application
  • aa) Determination of Endangerment
  • bb) Non-​conduct of the Parents
  • b) Principle of Proportionality
  • aa) Suitability
  • bb) Principle of Necessity
  • c) Study on Court Decisions Concerning Partial Withdrawal of Parental Custody
  • 6.2.2.3 § 1696 I BGB Amendment of Judicial Decisions and of Court-​Approved Settlement
  • a) Sound Reasons
  • b) Criteria
  • c) Proceedings
  • 6.2.3 From the Perspective of Procedural Law
  • 6.2.3.1 Interlocutory Orders
  • 6.2.3.2 Principle of Priority and Summary Procedure
  • 6.2.3.3 Guardian ad Litem in § 158 FamFG
  • a) Legal Prerequisite
  • b) Responsibility of Guardian ad Litem
  • c) Selection of Guardian ad Litem
  • 6.2.3.4 Facilitation of Agreement in § 156 FamFG
  • 6.2.3.5 Investigation of the Court
  • a) Hearing
  • b) Assessment of Expert Opinion
  • aa) Appointment of an Expert
  • bb) Qualification of an Expert
  • cc) Duties of an Expert
  • dd) Participation of Parties Involved
  • 6.3 Youth Welfare Office
  • 6.3.1 Carriers of Youth Welfare Service
  • 6.3.2 Evolvement of the Role of the Youth Welfare Office
  • 6.3.3 Involvement of the Youth Welfare Office in Issues Concerning Parental Custody After Separation or Divorce
  • 6.3.3.1 Consultation and Support
  • 6.3.3.2 Protection in Case of Endangerment Pursuant to § 8a SGB VIII
  • 6.3.3.3 Participation in Proceedings Before the Court
  • 6.4 Conclusion
  • 7 Parental Custody in Chinese Law
  • 7.1 Legal Historical Development on ‘Parental Custody’
  • 7.1.1 Before and in the Feudal Dynasties
  • 7.1.1.1 ‘Li’ (Rites) and Confucianism
  • a) ‘Li’ (Rites)
  • b) Legalisation of Confucianism
  • 7.1.1.2 Penetration of Confucianism in Kinship
  • a) Hierarchical Family Structure and Parental Authority
  • b) Filial Piety
  • 7.1.1.3 Conclusion
  • 7.1.2 During the Transition Period
  • 7.1.2.1 Late Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China (1912–​1949)
  • a) Legal Modernisation
  • b) Civil Law of the Republic of China in 1930
  • 7.1.2.2 Marriage Regulation and Law of the Chinese Soviet Republic
  • 7.1.3 Early Stage After Foundation of the People’s Republic of China
  • 7.1.3.1 Marriage Law of 1950
  • 7.1.3.2 Historical Influence
  • 7.1.4 Summary
  • 7.2 Current Legal Basis
  • 7.2.1 Domestic Laws
  • 7.2.1.1 Constitution
  • 7.2.1.2 General Rules of Civil Law and Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on Its Implementation
  • a) From General Principles of Civil Law to General Rules of Civil Law
  • b) Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Implementation of GPCL 1987
  • 7.2.1.3 Marriage Law
  • a) Marriage Law of 1980
  • b) Revision of the Marriage Law of 1980 in 2001
  • c) Interpretations of the Supreme People’s Court on Marriage Law
  • 7.2.1.4 Rules Protecting the Minors’ Rights and Interests
  • a) Law on the Protection of Minors
  • b) Opinions on Legally Handling Several Issues on Guardian’s Infringement upon the Rights and Interests of Minors
  • 7.2.1.5 Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on the Matter of Parental Custody in Divorce Trials
  • 7.2.1.6 Civil Procedure Law
  • 7.2.2 International Conventions
  • 7.2.2.1 Convention on the Rights of the Child
  • 7.2.2.2 Conventions of HCCH
  • 7.2.3 Summary
  • 7.3 Parental Custody After Separation or Divorce in China
  • 7.3.1 Domination of Joint Parental Custody
  • 7.3.2 Criteria to Determine Habitual Residence of the Child After Divorce of Parents
  • 7.3.2.1 Applicable Rules
  • 7.3.2.2 Case-​Law
  • 7.3.3 Exercise of Contact Right
  • 7.3.3.1 Applicable Rules
  • 7.3.3.2 Case-​Law
  • 8 Legal Comparison and Reform Discussion
  • 8.1 Legal Comparison
  • 8.1.1 From the Perspective of Substantive Law
  • 8.1.1.1 General Rules Concerning Parental Custody
  • a) Position of Parental Custody in the Legal System
  • b) Principle of the Best Interests of the Child
  • 8.1.1.2 Concrete Rules Concerning Parental Custody After Divorce or Separation
  • a) For the Child Born in Wedlock
  • b) For the Child Born Out of Wedlock
  • c) Right of Contact
  • d) The Wechselmodell
  • 8.1.2 From the Perspective of Procedural Law
  • 8.1.3 From the Perspective of Specialised Authority
  • 8.2 Reform Discussion on Parental Custody After Separation in Germany
  • 8.2.1 From Parental Custody to Parental Responsibility
  • 8.2.2 Exercise of Parental Responsibility After Separation of Parents
  • 8.2.2.1 Further Promotion of Joint Parental Responsibility
  • 8.2.2.2 From Residenzmodell to Wechselmodell (Shared Care)
  • 8.2.3 Balance Between Parental Autonomy and Interference of State Authorities
  • 8.2.4 On Parental Custody of Child Born Out of Wedlock
  • 8.2.4.1 Joint Parental Custody as Guiding Principle for Parents of the Child Born Out of Wedlock
  • 8.2.4.2 Promotion of Rights of the Biological but Not the Legal Father and Multiple Parenthood for Child Born Out of Wedlock
  • 8.3 Advice on Further Reform on Parental Custody After Separation of Parents in China
  • 8.3.1 Draft of Book of Family Law of the Chinese Civil Code
  • 8.3.2 From the Perspective of Substantive Law
  • 8.3.2.1 Systematic Modification of Legal Rules Concerning Relationship Between Parents and Children
  • 8.3.2.2 Principle of the Child’s Best Interests
  • 8.3.2.3 Parental Custody After Divorce
  • a) Determination of the Habitual Residence of the Children After Divorce
  • b) Exercise of Parental Custody
  • c) Right of Contact
  • 8.3.2.4 Legal Protection of the Child Born Out of Wedlock and the Biological but Not the Legal Father
  • a) Parental Custody of the Child Born Out of Wedlock
  • b) Biological but Not the Legal Father
  • aa) Determination of Biological and Legal Paternity
  • bb) Contact Right of the Biological but Not the Legal Father
  • 8.3.3 From the Perspective of Procedural Law
  • 8.3.3.1 Substantial Review of Agreement on Parental Custody by Marriage Registration Office
  • 8.3.3.2 Reform on Family Trial
  • a) Combination of Divorce Proceedings and Proceedings Connected to Divorce
  • b) Establishment of Summary Procedure
  • c) On Court Investigation
  • aa) Expert Opinions
  • bb) Hearing
  • d) Special Trial Concerning Custody Disputes
  • 8.3.4 Establishment of a Specialised Public Authority for Welfare of Children and Youth
  • 8.3.4.1 Background
  • a) Working Committees at Central Levels
  • b) At Local Levels
  • 8.3.4.2 Need to Establish a Public Authority for the Child
  • 8.3.5 Unification and Standardisation of Wordings in Verdicts or Literature
  • Appendix
  • 1. Extracts of Relevant Provisions in German Law
  • 1.1 Basic Law
  • 1.2 BGB
  • 2. Extracts of Relevant Provisions in Chinese Law
  • 2.1 Constitution
  • 2.2 General Rules of Civil Law
  • 2.3 Marriage Law
  • 2.4 Interpretations of the Supreme People’s Court to the Marriage Law
  • 2.4.1 Interpretation I
  • 2.4.2 Interpretation II
  • 2.4.3 Interpretation III
  • 2.5 Opinions of the Supreme People’ Court on the Matter of Parental Custody in Divorce Proceedings
  • 3. Statistic
  • 3.1 Percentage of the Child Born out of Wedlock in Germany
  • 3.2 Statistic of Abortion in Germany from 1996 to 2017
  • Bibliography

cover

Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek
Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen
Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über
http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar.

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the
Library of Congress.

About the author

Shuang Wang conducted her doctoral study in the University of Passau in Germany, where she graduated with Master of Laws (LL.M.) in 2010. Her research interest focuses on family law from a comparative perspective, especially on parental custody after separation or divorce.

About the book

Different from the traditional legislation in family issues which focused on marriage and divorce, current legislation in Germany has come to highlight the relationship between parents and children. The book focuses on parental custody after separation or divorce in Germany and China before a legal comparison is drawn. Furthermore, the book explores possible legal reforms in this field in the two legal systems.

This eBook can be cited

This edition of the eBook can be cited. To enable this we have marked the start and end of a page. In cases where a word straddles a page break, the marker is placed inside the word at exactly the same position as in the physical book. This means that occasionally a word might be bifurcated by this marker.

←7 | 8→

Acknowledgements

There are several people to be particularly acknowledged here for their contribution in the completion of my dissertation in which all the cited literature, laws and regulations are before 30 September 2019.

First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Hau who provided me the opportunity to pursue my doctoral study in Passau University. Without his guidance and encouragement, this thesis could not be completed. In addition, my gratitude goes to Prof. Dr. Dennis Solomon who is the second supervisor of my thesis and Prof. Dr. Nina Dethloff from University of Bonn who sent her works and articles in family law to me.

My thanks and appreciation go to all the other people who helped me in any respect during the completion of the dissertation, especially Prof. Dr. Florian Eichel who allowed the chance to co-​lead the seminar in the winter semester 2016/​2017, Ms. Sabine Cichon who is always kind, patient and helpful, and Mr. Andreas Bernrieder who generously provides help and shares knowledge with me.

Furthermore, I sincerely thank Chinese Scholarship Council for having funded my research work for two years. It is really hoped that this dissertation could slightly contribute to improvement of the legislation regarding parental custody after divorce or separation of parents and to promotion of rights of the children born out of wedlock in China.

Finally, I would like to show my eternal thankfulness to my parents Ms. Huaqin Zhang and Mr. Jiuda Wang for their unconditional love and support, and I thank my husband Mr. Longhui Shi who has made available his support in a number of ways.

←9 | 10→

Contents

Acknowledgements

List of Abbreviations

1 Introduction

1.1 Research Background

1.2 Current Research Status

1.3 Structure of the Thesis

2 Historical Development of the Legal Concept ‘Parental Custody’

2.1 Before the Implementation of the BGB

2.1.1 Ancient Roman Law (753 B.C.-​A.D. 476)

2.1.2 From the Early Modern Era to the End of 19th Century

2.2 Milestone Reforms to the Laws on Parental Custody Since the BGB of 1900

2.2.1 The BGB of 1900

2.2.2 Law of the Equal Rights Between Men and Women

2.2.3 First Reform Law on Marriage and Family of 14 June 1976

2.2.4 Reform of Parental Custody Act of 18 July 1979

2.2.5 Reform of Parents and Child Act of 1 July 1998

2.2.5.1 Background of the Reform

2.2.5.2 Main Content of the Reform

2.2.6 Reform of Act of Parental Custody of the Unmarried Parents of 19 May 2013

2.2.6.1 Background of the Reform

2.2.6.2 Main Content of the Reform

2.3 Current Applicable Laws

←10 | 11→

2.3.1 Domestic Laws

2.3.1.1 Basic Law (GG)

2.3.1.2 BGB

2.3.1.3 FamFG

2.3.1.4 Book VIII of Code of Social Law

2.3.2 International Laws and Conventions, Regulations of EU

2.3.2.1 Convention on the Rights of the Child

2.3.2.2 Child Protection Convention of Hague Conference

2.3.2.3 European Convention on Human Rights

2.3.2.4 Brussels IIa

2.4 Summary

3 An Overview of the Legal Concept of ‘Parental Custody’

3.1 Introduction

3.1.1 Concept of ‘Parental Custody’

3.1.2 Legal Nature

3.1.2.1 Right or Duty?

3.1.2.2 Public or Private?

3.1.2.3 Summary

3.1.3 Types of Parental Custody

3.1.3.1 Care for the Person and Care for the Property

3.1.3.2 Joint and Sole Parental Custody

a) Joint Parental Custody

b) Sole Parental Custody

3.1.4 Comparison with Other Legal Terms

3.1.4.1 Parental Responsibility

3.1.4.2 Guardianship, Legal Care and Curatorship

Details

Pages
254
Year
2020
ISBN (PDF)
9783631842027
ISBN (ePUB)
9783631842034
ISBN (MOBI)
9783631842041
ISBN (Softcover)
9783631838372
DOI
10.3726/b17848
Language
English
Publication date
2021 (January)
Published
Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Warszawa, Wien, 2020. 254 pp., 2 tables.

Biographical notes

Shuang Wang (Author)

Shuang Wang conducted her doctoral study in the University of Passau in Germany, where she graduated with Master of Laws (LL.M.) in 2010. Her research interest focuses on family law from a comparative perspective, especially on parental custody after separation or divorce.

Previous

Title: Parental Custody After Separation or Divorce
book preview page numper 1
book preview page numper 2
book preview page numper 3
book preview page numper 4
book preview page numper 5
book preview page numper 6
book preview page numper 7
book preview page numper 8
book preview page numper 9
book preview page numper 10
book preview page numper 11
book preview page numper 12
book preview page numper 13
book preview page numper 14
book preview page numper 15
book preview page numper 16
book preview page numper 17
book preview page numper 18
book preview page numper 19
book preview page numper 20
book preview page numper 21
book preview page numper 22
book preview page numper 23
book preview page numper 24
book preview page numper 25
book preview page numper 26
book preview page numper 27
book preview page numper 28
book preview page numper 29
book preview page numper 30
book preview page numper 31
book preview page numper 32
book preview page numper 33
book preview page numper 34
book preview page numper 35
book preview page numper 36
book preview page numper 37
book preview page numper 38
book preview page numper 39
book preview page numper 40
256 pages