Loading...

Epistemic Aphorisms

A Primer of Epistemology via Maxims

by Nicholas Rescher (Author)
©2024 Monographs X, 186 Pages

Summary

Epistemic Aphorisms is a wide-ranging consideration of issues in epistemology, from the classical and familiar (knowledge and justified true belief, and the problem of induction) to the unusual and often neglected (what alien science might look like, the ethics of epistemology, and the limits of conceptualization). In particular, it addresses questions in epistemology that are not generally asked, including questions regarding the ethics of secrets, the costs of inquiry, the factual trajectory of amassed information and its philosophical implications, and the prospect of science based on radically different categories. These inquiries are accompanied by suggestions for formal treatment in epistemic logic, again in directions that have not been previously pursued.
This book will be of use for undergraduate and graduate courses on epistemology and systems of knowledge, and will also appeal to those undertaking advanced research in the field.

Table Of Contents

  • Cover
  • Title
  • Copyright
  • About the author
  • About the book
  • This eBook can be cited
  • Contents
  • Preface
  • Introduction
  • I. Reality and Our Cognitive Access to It
  • II. Knowledge and Inquiry
  • III. Securing Knowledge
  • IV. Trust and Presumption
  • V. Quality and Quantity of Information
  • VI. Cognitive Dynamics
  • VII. Cognitive Systematization
  • VIII. Cognitive Obstacles
  • IX. Alien Science
  • X. The Unknown: Cognitive Horizons
  • XI. Cognitive Limits and Limitations
  • XII. Ultimate Questions
  • XIII. Cognitive Ethics
  • Conclusion
  • Name Index

Preface

Everywhere about us, the mass of information grows beyond all reckoning. It overflows libraries and fills etherspace. Only a fraction of it deserves the name of knowledge. And no specifiable fraction of it, however small, is present in any single knowing mind. And yet, while what is known is beyond us, what knowledge is—how the idea of knowledge functions—what is at issue with knowing rather than what is known is something we should be able to get hold of. It is this issue that preoccupies the present book.

The book is set up in an unusual way. It is a comprehensive survey of basic via specific theses that admit of aphoristic formulation.

I am indebted to Estelle Burris for indispensable aid in preparing the manuscript for publication.

Nicholas Rescher

Pittsburgh PA

March 2022

Introduction

There are three levels of cognitive capability: smarts, acumen, and wisdom. Smarts come from learning; it is geared to information, so that the smart person is somebody who knows a lot. Acumen is oriented to the application of information in deciding upon action: the acute (or astute) person is able to use what he knows toward getting what he wants. Wisdom, by contrast, is a matter of good judgment, of guidance by the true worth and importance of things: the wise person exercises sound thinking in relation to the appropriate aims and goals of life.

While the acute or astute person is shrewd in relation to deciding short-term issues about actions here and now, the wise person is able to see how these short-term decisions and actions can lead to good results over the larger course of life that is truly meaningful. Deepening our knowledge of nature’s modus operandi through scientific inquiry clearly extends our sagacity, although not necessarily our wisdom.

Acuity comes from practice in using ingenuity for problem-solving, but wisdom comes from insight based on either acquired or worldly wisdom or inspired or spiritual wisdom. Wisdom accordingly comes in two forms: worldly wisdom (or sophia) or inspired wisdom (or gnosis). Acquired wisdom is gained through experience and is usually the fruit of years; inspired wisdom is “the gift of the gods.” Knowledge, information, facts are the foundation of it all. Understanding how it works is basic to philosophical understanding at large.

Readers who want a historically and bibliographically adequate treatment of epistemology and its development will be disappointed. It doesn’t exist—not here, not anywhere. They will have to craft it for themselves, drawing on the pages of philosophical reference works and (especially) on the ampler offerings of the internet’s reference resources. The present work is only a compact synopsis of the mainstream issue. And even meeting that covers a very great deal of ground.

The style currently in vogue in philosophical exposition favors critical doxography—of critical discussion of proposed positions. Its mode is: “Here is what X says or thinks with regard to an issue, and here is a reason why one should view this as acceptable/unacceptable.” It is a matter of critical reactivity to predecessors who serve as mannequins on whom one hangs evaluative garments.

This, of course, is not how one proceeds in matters of factual inquiry in the natural or human sciences where how we got here to the present from what people used to think is not a matter of great concern. For better or worse, the present book takes somewhat the same approach to the domain of epistemology, the theory of knowledge. It seeks to address issues directly, rather than through the eyes of one or another of our philosophical predecessors.

·I· Reality and Our Cognitive Access to It

A. Reality and Its Constitution

  • Truth, like reality, must be located somewhere in the range of the possible. As Sherlock Holmes said, “When you have eliminated all alternatives, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Commentary. Inquiry often proceeds not additively by new findings but subtractively via the elimination of seeming possibilities. Of putative importance here is the “Sherlock Holmes Principle” (See A. Conan Doyle, “The Sign of Four” (1890)). However, for the application of this principle, it is crucial! (1) that the registration of alternatives be complete, without gaps or omissions, and (2) that the “elimination” of the alternatives does actually establish their untenability.

  • Our thought perspective on things must distinguish between
    • a possibility: a possibly realizable state of affairs, which in turn divides into two:
      • # a logical (formal) possibility: a state of affairs consistent with the laws of logic and the normativities of discourse.
      • # a physical (substantive) possibility: a state of affairs consistent with the laws of nature and the normativities of the world’s constitution.
    • an actuality: an existing state of affairs; one that is actual and forms part of Reality.

Commentary. This is ultimately a matter of how our thought, as shaped by logic and language, comes to be in a position to view its objects of concern.

  • Reality—the totality of what there actually is—encompasses both natural (or concrete) and theoretical (or abstract) existence.

Commentary. The former (natural) realm includes trees, clouds, sandstorms, and such features of Nature; the latter (abstract) realm includes quantities, shapes, and relationships, and such modes of interpretative characterization.

  • The sector of Reality that is most crucial for us in the conduct of life is Natural Reality—the realm in which we live and move and have our being, alike physically and mentally.

Commentary. Homo sapiens (mankind) exists within the realm of Natural Reality, managing life largely by means of exploiting putative information about it. It is simply a “fact of life” that we are creatures that generally guide action not by instinct and automaticity, but by thought. And we act on the basis not of the truth as such, but rather of what we think to be true, of putative rather than actual facts.

  • Mathematics is the science of structure, and understanding some aspects of the structure of Reality is essential for an intelligent being’s ability to act successfully within its orbit.

Commentary. Mathematics is essential to the characterization of natural Reality. Our mathematics is destined to be attuned to nature because it itself is a natural product as a thought-instrument of ours: it fits nature because it reflects the way we ourselves are emplaced within nature as integral constituents thereof. Our intellectual mechanisms—mathematics included—fit nature because they are themselves a product of nature’s operations as mediated through the cognitive processes of an intelligent creature that uses its intelligence to guide its interaction with a nature into which it is itself fitted in a particular sort of way.

The apparent success of mathematics in characterizing nature is thus not amazing. It may or may not call for wonder that intelligent creatures should evolve at all. But, once they have safely arrived on the scene through evolutionary means, it is only natural and to be expected that they should be able to achieve success in the project of understanding nature in mathematical terms. A mathematicizing intelligence arrived at through evolution must for this very reason prove to be substantially successful in characterizing the world’s ways. (But of course there are other modes of attunement to Nature than by thought.)

B. Reality and Appearance

  • We humans are imperfect knowers: We have every reason to realize that our knowledge of Reality and its constituents is both: (1) incomplete, with gaps, and (2) imperfect, including items that are incorrect.

Commentary. Ample experience indicates this, and the ensuing deliberations will substantiate this in detail.

  • Reality stands in contrast to our conception of it.

Commentary. Actual Reality encompasses two domains: (1) Actually existing reality, and (2) the merely possible but nonexistent. Both of these differentiate in line with the contrast with Putative Reality: that which we merely think to be actual or possible.

  • Actual Reality is the overall state of things—the whole of existence. It is the condition of affairs as the manifold of fact represents it.

Commentary. This is effectively a matter of definition—conjointly of “fact” and “reality.”

Details

Pages
X, 186
Year
2024
ISBN (PDF)
9781433199035
ISBN (ePUB)
9781433199042
ISBN (Hardcover)
9781433199011
DOI
10.3726/b20092
Language
English
Publication date
2024 (April)
Keywords
philosopher American Catholic Philosophical Association Federal Republic of Germany Epistemic Aphorisms A Primer of Epistemology via Maxims Nicholas Rescher
Published
New York, Berlin, Bruxelles, Chennai, Lausanne, Oxford, 2024. X, 186 pp.

Biographical notes

Nicholas Rescher (Author)

Nicholas Rescher, who sadly passed away just as this book went to press, was a widely published philosopher. He was awarded the Aquinas Medal of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, the Helmholtz Medal of the Berlin/Brandenburg Academy of Sciences, and the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany. He also received honorarydegrees from eight universities on three continents.

Previous

Title: Epistemic Aphorisms