Death by a Thousand Cuts: A Microsociology of How University Administration Stifles Solidarity
22 Pages
Open Access
Journal:
PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Volume 6
Issue 2
Publication Year 2024
pp. 201 - 222
Summary
This paper investigates how university administration influences solidarity in collaborative research and impact generation. We understand solidarity as the main stratum that makes higher education institutions function, as not to be swamped by their own complexity. Through autoethnographic case study on research impact evidencing and generation from an administrative perspective, we analyse bureaucratic dynamics that hinder solidarity formation by using Michael Lipsky's Street-Level Bureaucrats framework. We uncover how procedural issues, language barriers, and network dynamics hinder solidarity formation. We argue that rigid adherence to bureaucratic protocols and insensitivity to academic realities disconnect administrators from academics, impeding collaboration. We emphasize the importance of personal motivations in fostering collaborative environments. Our findings underscore the need for a paradigm shift toward balancing community welfare and individual well-being within academic institutions. By acknowledging administrative system biases and fostering mutual respect, we can mitigate solidarity erosion and enhance collaborative research for societal benefit.
Details
- Pages
- 22
- DOI
- 10.3726/PTIHE.022024.0201
- Open Access
- CC-BY
- Keywords
- solidarity university administration research impact microsociology autoethnography
- Product Safety
- Peter Lang Group AG