Edited By Esther Thorson, Mitchell S. McKinney and Dhavan Shah
Chapter Three: Political Advertising and the Hierarchy of Political Socialization in Teens
| 47 →
Political Advertising AND THE Hierarchy OF Political Socialization IN Teens
ESTHER THORSON, EUNJIN KIM, AND MARGARET DUFFY
In the political socialization literature, family, school, the news media, and talking with others about politics are generally considered to have the most impact on how youth develop their interest, knowledge, and involvement in politics. More than thirty years of behavioral research, however, has also shown the significance of political advertising or direct persuasive messages (such as promotional e-mails) in the socialization process. This study attempts to add to our existing knowledge base by juxtaposing the impact of political advertising against the major structural causes of youth socialization, and comparing its impact to that of political news, both authoritative and opinionated.
The Media Choice Model (Thorson & Duffy, 2006; see Figure 1) suggests that all mass media messages have a “voice” that is expressed primarily in terms of who the source is and where they are located on the information-persuasion dimension. Traditional news, such as metropolitan newspapers or evening network television, is an “authoritative” source that presents its information as important and unbiased, and as being more informative than persuasive, sometimes even calling itself “objective,” although that claim is largely rejected by scholars of news (e.g., Chomsky, 2002; Schudson, 1997). Opinionated news claims to provide information of importance to all, but from the speaker’s point of view. Fox News, Bill O’Reilly, and MSNBC are good examples of opinionated...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.