Resource Rich Muslim Countries and Islamic Institutional Reforms explores the "resource curse," a condition in which a country’s abundance of natural resources is negatively linked with the country’s development and economic growth, in resource rich Muslim countries. The resource curse puzzle has been studied for over twenty years, with prior researchers looking to prove its existence and explore its causes. Recent studies have begun to indicate institutional failure as a likely cause of the curse, as wealth of resources tends to cause counterproductive behaviors such as rent-seeking, patronage and corruption. The subpar economic performance of resource rich Muslim countries in the Organization of the Islamic Cooperation (OIC) could be attributed to the manifestation of a resource curse. Collectively, the member countries of the OIC contribute over 9% of the world’s total GDP with 22.8% of the world’s population. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates alone contribute about 17% of world oil production. Resource rich Muslim countries should be at the forefront of economic performance and growth, yet we see the opposite when we compare the performance of these countries to countries that are not resource rich (such as Spain, France, Hong Kong and Japan). Through an analysis of sample countries, the authors have discovered that natural resources exert a drag on the countries’ economic growth, thereby indicating the presence of the resource curse. Their research also found weaknesses in the quality of institutions as the cause of the curse. To counteract the negative effects of the resource curse in resource rich Muslim countries, the authors provide a number of Islamic institutional reforms.
Chapter 2: The Resource Curse—Theory, Explanations and Its Reversal
| 7 →
· 2 ·
THE RESOURCE CURSE—THEORY, EXPLANATIONS AND ITS REVERSAL
The resource curse phenomenon suggests that the presence of abundant natural resources may hinder economic growth. According to Cavalcanti, Mohaddes, and Raissi (2011) one of the influential works in the resource curse study was conducted by Sachs and Warner (1995). Sachs and Warner demonstrate that after controlling for a wide variety of variables, an increase of one standard deviation in natural resource intensity would lead to a reduction of about 1% per year in economic growth (Bulte, Damania, & Deacon, 2005). The study has subsequently inspired a large volume of empirical research specifically in determining the various causes of the resource curse. Various factors such as political instability and conflict (including armed conflict) have been identified as common causes.
Many academics have provided significant contributions in their attempt to decipher the resource curse puzzle. The vast literature on the resource curse over the past decade shows how research and work on the subject have evolved. At the inception of the resource curse notion, published materials focused on both exploring and validating the theory. In these studies, while the countries and the resource sectors under analysis may have varied, the ← 7 | 8 → focus of the research was similar. Could higher dependence on a depletable natural resource be directly associated with lower economic growth? As the theory on the resource curse gained traction and momentum, the second wave of work saw...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.