Chapter Two Partisan, Hostile, Fake, or Real: The Fragmentation of News
Partisan, Hostile, Fake, orReal: The Fragmentationof News
In late 2019, two concurrent narratives played out in political media. One featured hearings for the impeachment of Republican President Donald J. Trump; the other unfolded quite differently on social media and in other conservative outlets. For instance, in one world, Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Congress would advance impeachment charges against Trump “with the utmost gravity” while in the other world, four minutes after Pelosi was done speaking, President Trump used Twitter to call the decision “witch hunt garbage” and then, 30 seconds after that, Trump’s re-election campaign, grabbed the President’s baton. Although most mainstream media outlets relayed the gravity of the impeachment charges, Bennett and Wilson (2019) document that 20 minutes (and just $100,000) was all it took to place paid advertisements in the feeds of two million Facebook accounts, each exclaiming that “The ONLY thing stopping Democrats from carrying out their impeachment WITCH HUNT is Patriotic Americans standing with President Trump” (emphasis original, p. 52). The campaign message then filters through Facebook and becomes less easily traced; once one of those two million people shared the ad, it still appeared as Trump-sponsored on the user/sharer’s account, yet conspicuously does not get presented as Trump-sponsored to accounts in which the content is shared. Suddenly, it appears in tens of millions of other feeds, everyone is producing “witch hunt”-related messages. Americans were talking about the same topic, but the postulates we typically tout via agenda-setting ←29 | 30...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.