Chapter 2. Theory and History of Historiography
The previous chapter outlined Croce’s position on history in the Logica of 1909, and the shift from art to philosophy that makes possible the identity of history and philosophy. For Croce, it is not a question of an epistemological shift but of a “natural” evolution with which history frees itself from art and joins philosophy in a new identity. The shift is modeled on Vico’s New Science, as Croce recounts in his analysis of this work, which dates to about the same time, 1911:
The human mind—which naturally desires to unite with God whence it comes, that is, with the true One, but unable given the exuberant sensual nature of primitive man to exercise this faculty, buried under its too powerful senses, to abstract from subjects their universal properties and forms, imagined imaginary unities, fantastic universals or myths—in its subsequent unfolding or development resolves, as it goes, the fantastic universals in intelligible universals, the poetic universals in rational ones, and frees itself from myth. The error of myth thus passes in the truth of philosophy. (FGBV 69; emphasis mine)1
The freeing of the mind from the error of myth is the fiction of the mind that believes it has overcome the errors of the past in the new truth of philosophy. The truth of philosophy is now the new name of what was once the error of myth. Similarly, the shift in the Logica that makes possible the identity of history and philosophy...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.