Show Less
Restricted access

Three Approaches to Presidential Foreign Policy-Making in the Twenty-First Century

The Executive, the Magistrate, and the Maverick

Luis da Vinha and Anthony Dutton

Political scientists have long determined that a president’s relationships with his advisors is crucial in determining an administration’s policies. Over the last several decades, scholars of the presidency have paid particular attention to the advisory structures and processes involved in foreign policy decision-making. Their work has contributed to the development and refinement of three presidential management models to help frame the analysis of foreign policy-making: (1) formalistic model, (2) collegial model, and (3) competitive model. This book analyzes the management models employed by presidents George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump throughout their presidencies by employing a structured-focus comparison method that is framed on a set of general and standardized questions used to analyze a series of case studies involving their Middle East policies. The book offers the first systematic comparative analysis of presidents Bush, Obama, and Trump’s management of foreign policy crises.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

7. Walking and Chewing Gum at the Same Time: Responding to the Arab Spring in Egypt

Extract

7 Walking and Chewing Gum at the Same Time: Responding to the Arab Spring in Egypt

President Obama initially laid out his vision for the Middle East in June of 2009. Speaking at Cairo University, Obama (2009b) highlighted the ongoing tension between the West, notably the US, and Islam, and explained how the distrust between the two cultures had increasingly empowered violent extremists and fueled a cycle of mutual suspicion and discord. In an attempt to redefine America’s relationship with the world’s Muslim communities, particularly in the Middle East, Obama called for a new relationship based upon common interests and reciprocal respect. While acknowledging that both cultures could learn from each other, the president also emphasized the need for political reforms in the region that assured that all individuals had access to universal human rights – e.g., freedom of expression, access to political process, confidence in rule of law, a fair judicial system, government free from corruption, and freedom to live as one chose. Accordingly, Obama made it clear that governments must respect the will of the people:

You must maintain your power through consent, not coercion; you must respect the rights of minorities and participate with a spirit of tolerance and compromise; you must place the interests of your people and the legitimate workings of the political process above your party. Without these ingredients, elections alone do not make true democracy. (Obama, 2009b)

Similar calls for political reform in the Middle East were echoed...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.