Not Everything is Grace
1. Pure Nature and the Challenge of Integralism 1
1. Pure Nature and the Challenge of Integralism “IN EVERYTHING GOD works for good with those who love him” (Rom 8:28). This is what St Thérèse of Lisieux meant when she said, famously, that “every- thing is grace.”1 However, there are other contexts in which it is important to affirm that not everything is grace. This dissertation is about a theological dis- pute involving some of those other contexts, the dispute over the idea of pure nature. In this study we will explore the Thomistic notion of pure nature and ex- amine the opposing idea of Catholic integralism, as developed by the French Jesuit Henri de Lubac (1896–1981) and later by the lay Anglican theologian John Milbank (b. 1952). We proceed in this introductory chapter under the following six headings: 1. Defining Pure Nature 2. Objections to the Notion of Pure Nature 3. Defining Integralism 4. The Integralist Challenge of Henri de Lubac 5. The Integralist Challenge of John Milbank 6. The Plan of this Study Defining Pure Nature “Pure nature” is a term which became common in the scholastic tradition, particularly among Thomists. When it was first used, and by whom, is un- known. St Thomas Aquinas, in any event, does consider human being and action under the formality of the purely natural (in puris naturalibus) as we shall see in chapters three and four, below. Not Everything is Grace 2 We may draw a working definition of pure nature from the writings of...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.