Show Less

Philosophical Profiles in the Theory of Communication

With a Foreword by Richard J. Bernstein and an Afterword by John Durham Peters

Edited By Jason Hannan

Philosophical Profiles in the Theory of Communication is the first book to draw systematic attention to the theme of communication in twentieth-century academic philosophy. It covers a broad range of philosophical perspectives on communication, including those from analytic philosophy, pragmatism, critical theory, phenomenology, hermeneutics, feminism, psychoanalysis, systems theory, and more. What emerges is a vital, long-neglected story about the theme of communication in late modern academic philosophy. Each chapter features a «profile» of a particular philosophical figure, with a brief intellectual biography, an overview of that figure’s contribution to communication theory, and a critical assessment of the significance of that contribution. The clear and accessible organization of the volume makes it ideal for courses in both philosophy and communication studies.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

13 Jacques Lacan: Psychoanalysis With(in) Communication CHRISTIAN LUNDBERG 325


13 Jacques Lacan Psychoanalysis With(in) Communication CHRISTIAN LUNDBERG ________________________________________ “In the present state of affairs,” announced Jacques Lacan, it is “touch and go whether the entire theory of what goes on in living beings will be revised as a function of communication.”1 It is difficult to know whether this is typical Lacanian hyperbole or a prediction proffered with the utmost sincerity: Communication looms large in the work of the French psychoanalyst. Both an object of scathing critique and a resource for reframing Freudian psychoanalysis in the context of the linguistic turn, communication constitutes one of the critical touchstones of the Lacanian project. Engaging this touchstone, Lacan rejected or reframed a number of elements of classical communication theory, which many communication theorists also came to reconsider: the sender-receiver model, communication as transmission, and a focus on meaning as the privileged locus of communicative exchange, to name a few. Perhaps Lacan’s ambivalence toward communication stems from the fact that despite his marked dissatisfaction with contemporary theories of communication, crucial concepts in the Lacanian canon could only be fully articulated with the help of a model of communicative exchange that attends to the function of the exchange of signifier and signified, tropes, speech, and the circulation of each of these elements in discourse. Lacan’s ambivalence regarding communication bears important fruits for a theory of communication. The Lacanian revision of communication theory proffers a model for thinking not only about the failure of communication conceived of as transmission between a sender and receiver,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.