Aesthetic Experience and Visual Art in Henry James’s Novels
CHAPTER THREE: (Re)presenting Miriam Rooth in The Tragic Muse 63
Chapter Three (Re)presenting Miriam Rooth in The Tragic Muse Basil Ransom sways Verena Tarrant away from the stage before the Boston debut that would have altered her life forever; in The Tragic Muse (1890) Peter Sherringham fails to have the same effect on Miriam Rooth, who scorns his proposal that she abandon her acting career in order to marry him. Though opposites in this respect, both women are talented artist figures who occupy central positions in their respective novels. Despite the prominent position of these women in the narratives, however, their thoughts are not directly re- vealed. Instead, readers must approach Miriam and Verena as objects d’art through other revealed consciousnesses. In the 1908 Preface to The Tragic Muse, James explains, “I never ‘go behind’ Miriam; only poor Sherringham goes, a great deal, and Nick Dormer goes a little, and the author, while they so waste wonderment, goes behind them” (9). This narrative technique forces readers to view Miriam, like Verena, from the consciousnesses of the “reflec- tors,” or other characters, who surround her.1 Concealing Miriam’s thoughts, does not mean, however, that she is inac- cessible or that her consciousness is unworthy of transparency, as most schol- arship suggests. S. Gorley Putt, for example, calls Miriam a “comparatively slight character” (209), and Alan Bellringer, perhaps her harshest critic, writes that “Obviously her mind is too undeveloped and second-hand to serve as one of James’s fine ‘registers or “reflectors”’ of experience. She is not, unlike Isabel Archer in The...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.