Show Less

Working Together

A Case Study of a National Arts Education Partnership


Bernard W. Andrews

Partnerships among a variety of institutions – for profit, not-for-profit, and non-profit – are a relatively recent organizational development. Such partnerships link businesses, government, and social agencies. The primary reason for these relationships is to achieve goals sooner and more efficiently by building on the resources and expertise of each partner. In arts education, schools, arts organizations, cultural institutions, government agencies, and universities have engaged in joint ventures to improve the teaching and learning of the arts disciplines in their schools and in their communities. These partnerships have been particularly beneficial for teachers, many of whom have limited background in the arts but are expected to teach them in their classrooms. Arts partnerships initially focused on the goals of the participating organizations; that is, to develop artistic skills, to build future audiences, and/or to encourage young people to consider an artistic career. More recently, partnerships focus on educational goals rather than solely artistic ones. Despite the challenges and complexities of arts education partnerships, most partners believe that the benefits to students, teachers and the community outweigh the disadvantages and consequently, as the research in Working Together demonstrates, they are willing to justify the time, energy, and expense involved to improve the quality of arts education.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access



Addo, A. O. (2003). Music teacher education: Assessing a community outreach program. Teaching Education, 14(2), 201–211. AEP (Arts Education Partnership). (2000). Learning partnerships: Improving learning in schools with arts partners in the community. Washington, DC: Author. AEP (Arts Education Partnership). (2001). Strengthening state-level arts education partnerships. Washington, DC: Author. AEP (Arts Education Partnership). (2002). National Forum on partnerships: Improving teaching of the arts. Washington, DC: Author. AEPNF (Arts Education Partnership National Forum). (2002). Creating quality integrated and interdisciplinary arts programs. Washington, DC: Author. Andrews, B. W. (1995). Re-designing the arts curriculum of teacher education: A collaborative approach. Canadian Journal of Research in Music Education, 36(7), 33–39. Andrews, B. W. (1997). Assessing the effectiveness of a collaborative approach to program delivery in arts teacher education. McGill Journal of Education, 32(2), 163–176. Andrews, B. W. (1999). Side by side: Evaluating a partnership program in arts teacher educa- tion. International Electronic Journal of Leadership in Learning, 4(1). Retrieved from http:// Andrews, B. W. (2000). Land of shadows. Language and Literacy, 2(1). Retrieved from http:// Andrews, B. W. (2001a). ArtsSmarts evaluation results, Year 3: Report on the findings. Report prepared for the Canadian Conference of the Arts. Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa. 150 a case study of a national arts education partnership Andrews, B. W. (2001b). Addendum: ArtsSmarts evaluation results, Year 3: Report. Report pre- pared for the Canadian Conference of the Arts. Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa. Andrews, B. W. (2001c)...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.