Part Three: The Pelagian Crisis (411–430)
Edited By Frederick Van Fleteren
Article 221: Donatist Reactions
The truth had been clarified by the conference of 411 and confirmed by the law of Honorius. More than ever before, Donatist bishops, their clergy, and laity were re-uniting with the Church. They were embracing peace with generosity,1 but constantly suffered persecution from their members who remained stubborn, even to the point of losing corporeal members or their lives. The grace of conversion is not given everyone. Some said they would never leave the Donatist party.2 No one could show them the Catholic truth and the error of their ways.
Some Donatist bishops fled; others hid, still others, such as Emeritus of Algiers, retired.3 The Catholics permitted Emeritus to retire after the debate of 418. They freed several less considerable figures, doing them no harm. The Donatists publicly explained of all those who had fallen into Catholic hands no one had denied Catholicism.
Donatists complained they suffered persecution and had no place to hide.4 They held councils and ordained bishops to replace those who had burned themselves. One council among others, apparently before 420, consisted of more than more than thirty people, including Petilianus. The council offered bishops and priests who had communicated with Catholics pardon for their sin and re-entry to the sect with all their previous honors, provided they had not offered mass and preached publicly as a Catholic. This order actually destroyed the foundation of their sect.
The Catholics worked for re-union...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.